Ocular fundus examination is a critical part of the physical examination in patients with severely elevated blood pressure (BP), which is defined by the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7) as a BP exceeding 180/120 mm Hg. Indeed, the presence or absence of severe, grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy helps differentiate hypertensive emergencies requiring intensive care from less severe hypertensive urgencies. As a secondary analysis in the Fundus photography versus Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department (FOTO-ED) study, we sought to explore potential risk factors, in particular BP, for the presence of ocular fundus abnormalities relevant to the care of emergency department (ED) patients. We found evidence of acute end-organ ocular damage at lower blood pressures than the JNC7 criteria.
Objective: Non-mydriatic fundus photography by non-ophthalmic trained personnel has recently been shown to be a potential alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy in the emergency department (ED). We evaluated the reliability of a novel quality rating scale and applied this scale to non-mydriatic fundus photographs taken during routine ED patient encounters to determine factors associated with diminished photograph quality.
Design: Prospective, cross-sectional
Participants: 350 patients enrolled in the Fundus photography vs. Ophthalmoscopy Trials Outcomes in the Emergency Department (FOTO-ED) study were photographed by nurse practitioners after <30 minutes of training followed by supervision.
Methods: Photographs of both eyes were graded for quality on two occasions by two neuro-ophthalmologists. Four regions were independently evaluated for quality: optic disc, macula, superior and inferior vascular arcades. Quality as a function of the number of photographs taken was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression was used to evaluate for predictors of image quality while accounting for the repeated measures design.
Main Outcome Measure: Overall photographic quality (1–5 scale, 5 best).
Results: We evaluated 1734 photographs. Inter- and intra-observer agreements between neuro-ophthalmologists were very good (weighted kappa:0.84–0.87). Quality of the optic disc area was better than those of other retinal areas (p<0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that if a high-quality photograph of an eye was not obtained by the third attempt it was unlikely that one would be obtained at all. A 10 second increase in the inter-photograph interval before a total of forty seconds increased the odds of a one unit higher quality rating by 1.81 times (95%CI: 1.68–1.98), and a ten year increase in age decreased the odds by 0.76 times (95%CI: 0.69–0.85). Black patients had 0.42 times (95%CI: 0.28–0.63) the odds of a one unit higher quality rating compared to whites.
Conclusions: Our 5-point scale is a reliable measure of non-mydriatic photograph quality. The region of interest, interphotograph interval, age, and race are significant predictors of image quality for non-mydriatic photographs taken by nurse practitioners in the ED. Addressing these factors may have a direct impact on the successful implementation of non-mydriatic fundus photography into the ED.
Examination of the ocular fundus is imperative in the diagnosis and treatment of many acute medical and neurologic conditions, but direct ophthalmoscopy is underused and difficult to perform without pharmacologic pupillary dilation. We believe that nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography (i.e., performed without pupillary dilation) represents a promising alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy, particularly in the emergency department, where limited training in ophthalmoscopy, increased demands on physicians' time, and underappreciation of the prognostic value of ocular fundus examination can place patients at risk for poor outcomes and expose their caregivers to medicolegal liability. The FOTO-ED (Fundus Photography vs. Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department) study hypothesized that the use of nonmydriatic fundus photography in the emergency department would result in increased detection of abnormalities in the ocular fundus relevant to emergency-department care, a majority of which would be missed during routine clinical practice in the department.
Vascular neuro-ophthalmology includes visual symptoms and signs found in stroke patients as well as numerous primary vascular disorders involving the eye and the optic nerves. The clinical presentation varies depending on the type of vessel involved (arteries versus veins), the type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), and the size of the arteries involved (large versus small artery disease).
The blood supply to the eye is mostly provided by branches of the ophthalmic artery, which is a branch of the internal carotid artery (ICA) (Fig. 1A). This is why many patients with cerebral ischemia in the territory of the anterior circulation may present with ipsilateral visual changes. The posterior circulation provides the blood supply to the occipital lobes and posterior fossa; hence binocular visual loss or abnormal extraocular movements are common with vascular diseases affecting the posterior circulation. In addition, a number of ocular vascular disorders are associated with specific neurologic manifestations and numerous systemic inflammatory diseases or hypercoaguable states can affect the eyes and the brain simultaneously.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of optic nerve and retinal vascular changes within the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) population are not well-known, although it has been postulated that optic nerve ischemic changes and findings related to an elevated intracranial pressure may be more common in OSA patients. We prospectively evaluated the ocular fundus in unselected patients undergoing overnight diagnostic polysomnography (PSG).
METHODS: Demographic data, medical/ocular history, and nonmydriatic fundus photographs were prospectively collected in patients undergoing PSG at our institution and reviewed for the presence of optic disc edema for which our study was appropriately powered a priori. Retinal vascular changes were also evaluated. OSA was defined using the measures of both sleep-disordered breathing and hypoxia.
RESULTS: Of 250 patients evaluated in the sleep center, fundus photographs were performed on 215 patients, among whom 127 patients (59%) had an apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events per hour, including 36 with severe OSA. Those with AHI <15 served as the comparison group. None of the patients had optic disc edema (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0%-3%). There was no difference in rates of glaucomatous appearance or pallor of the optic disc among the groups. Retinal arteriolar changes were more common in severe OSA patients (odds ratio: 1.09 per 5 unit increase in AHI; 95% CI, 1.02-1.16; P = 0.01), even after controlling for mean arterial blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an increased prevalence of optic disc edema or other optic neuropathies in our OSA population. However, retinal vascular changes were more common in patients with severe OSA, independent of blood pressure.
We report a unique case of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in which vision loss likely occurred from a variety of mechanisms, including an acute choroidal infarction.
Introduction: Hypertensive retinopathy describes a spectrum of retinal changes in patients with elevated blood pressure (BP). It is unknown why some patients are more likely to develop acute ocular end-organ damage than others with similar BP. We examined risk factors for grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy among patients with hypertensive urgency in the emergency department (ED) and compared healthcare utilization and mortality between patients with and without grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy.
Methods: A preplanned subanalysis of patients who presented to a university hospital ED with diastolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg and who enrolled in the Fundus Photography versus Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the ED study was performed. Bilateral nonmydriatic ocular fundus photographs, vital signs, and demographics were obtained at presentation. Past medical history, laboratory values, healthcare utilization, and mortality were ascertained from medical record review at least 8 months after initial ED visit.
Results: Twenty-one patients with diastolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg, 7 of whom (33%) had grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy, were included. Patients with retinopathy were significantly younger than those without (median 33 vs 50 years, P= 0.02). Mean arterial pressure (165 vs 163 mmHg) was essentially equal in the 2 groups. Patients with retinopathy had substantially increased but nonsignificant rates of ED revisit (57% vs 29%, P = 0.35) and hospital admission after ED discharge (43% vs 14%, P = 0.28). One of the patients with retinopathy died, but none without.
Conclusion: Younger patients may be at higher risk for grade III/IV hypertensive retinopathy among patients with hypertensive urgency. Chronic compensatory mechanisms may have not yet developed in these younger patients. Alternatively, older patients with retinopathy may be underrepresented secondary to increased mortality among these patients at a younger age (survivorship bias). Further research is needed to validate these preliminary findings.
The widespread use of smartphones, provides a unique opportunity for telemedicine. In ophthalmology, smartphones are used for visual acuity assessments and to document examinations, particularly in settings like the emergency department (ED), where the usual ophthalmic tools and photographic services are unavailable. However, to our knowledge, these devices have not been used for systematic, remote review of clinical photographs, as they have in radiology and dermatology. We performed a pilot investigation to compare the quality of non-mydriatic fundus photographs displayed on an iPhone 3G versus a desktop computer.