Cardiovascular simulations have great potential as a clinical tool for planning and evaluating patient-specific treatment strategies for those suffering from congenital heart diseases, specifically Fontan patients. However, several bottlenecks have delayed wider deployment of the simulations for clinical use; the main obstacle is simulation cost. Currently, time-averaged clinical flow measurements are utilized as numerical boundary conditions (BCs) in order to reduce the computational power and time needed to offer surgical planning within a clinical time frame. Nevertheless, pulsatile blood flow is observed in vivo, and its significant impact on numerical simulations has been demonstrated. Therefore, it is imperative to carry out a comprehensive study analyzing the sensitivity of using time-averaged BCs. In this study, sensitivity is evaluated based on the discrepancies between hemodynamic metrics calculated using time-averaged and pulsatile BCs; smaller discrepancies indicate less sensitivity. The current study incorporates a comparison between 3D patient-specific CFD simulations using both the time-averaged and pulsatile BCs for 101 Fontan patients. The sensitivity analysis involves two clinically important hemodynamic metrics: hepatic flow distribution (HFD) and indexed power loss (iPL). Paired demographic group comparisons revealed that HFD sensitivity is significantly different between single and bilateral superior vena cava cohorts but no other demographic discrepancies were observed for HFD or iPL. Multivariate regression analyses show that the best predictors for sensitivity involve flow pulsatilities, time-averaged flow rates, and geometric characteristics of the Fontan connection. These predictors provide patient-specific guidelines to determine the effectiveness of analyzing patient-specific surgical options with time-averaged BCs within a clinical time frame.
Total cavopulmonary connection is the result of a series of palliative surgical repairs performed on patients with single ventricle heart defects. The resulting anatomy has complex and unsteady hemodynamics characterized by flow mixing and flow separation. Although varying degrees of flow pulsatility have been observed in vivo, non-pulsatile (time-averaged) boundary conditions have traditionally been assumed in hemodynamic modeling, and only recently have pulsatile conditions been incorporated without completely characterizing their effect or importance. In this study, 3D numerical simulations with both pulsatile and non-pulsatile boundary conditions were performed for 24 patients with different anatomies and flow boundary conditions from Georgia Tech database. Flow structures, energy dissipation rates and pressure drops were compared under rest and simulated exercise conditions. It was found that flow pulsatility is the primary factor in determining the appropriate choice of boundary conditions, whereas the anatomic configuration and cardiac output had secondary effects. Results show that the hemodynamics can be strongly influenced by the presence of pulsatile flow. However, there was a minimum pulsatility threshold, identified by defining a weighted pulsatility index (wPI), above which the influence was significant. It was shown that when wPI < 30%, the relative error in hemodynamic predictions using time-averaged boundary conditions was less than 10% compared to pulsatile simulations. In addition, when wPI < 50, the relative error was less than 20%. A correlation was introduced to relate wPI to the relative error in predicting the flow metrics with non-pulsatile flow conditions.
by
Lakshmi P. Dasi;
Resmi Krishnankutty Rema;
Hiroumi Kitajima;
Kerem Pekkan;
Kartik S. Sundareswaran;
Mark Fogel;
Shiva Sharma;
Kevin Whitehead;
Kirk Kanter;
Ajit Yoganathan
Objective: We quantify the geometric and hemodynamic characteristics of extracardiac and lateral tunnel Fontan surgical options and correlate certain anatomic characteristics with their hemodynamic efficiency and patient cardiac index. Methods and Results: The study was conducted retrospectively on 22 patients undergoing Fontan operations (11 extracardiac and 11 lateral tunnel operations). Total cavopulmonary connection geometric parameters such as vessel areas, curvature, and offsets were quantified using a skeletonization method. Energy loss at the total cavopulmonary connection junction was available from previous in vitro experiments and computational fluid dynamic simulations for 5 and 9 patients, respectively. Cardiac index data were available for all patients. There was no significant difference in the mean and minimum cross-sectional vessel areas of the pulmonary artery between the extracardiac and lateral tunnel groups. The indexed energy dissipation within the total cavopulmonary connection was strongly correlated to minimum cross-sectional area of the pulmonary arteries (R2 value of 0.90 and P < .0002), whereas all other geometric features, including shape characteristics, had no significant correlation. Finally, cardiac index significantly correlated with the minimum pulmonary artery area (P = .006), suggesting that total cavopulmonary connection energy losses significantly affect resting cardiac output. Conclusions: The minimum outlet size of the total cavopulmonary connection (ie, minimum cross section of pulmonary artery) governs the energy loss characteristics of the total cavopulmonary connection more strongly than variations in the shapes corresponding to extracardiac and lateral tunnel configurations. Differences in pulmonary artery sizes must be accounted for when comparing energy losses between extracardiac and lateral tunnel geometries.