Robust Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping via Approximate Message Passing with Parameter Estimation

• Authors: Shuai Huang, Emory University; James J Lah, Emory University; Jason William Allen, Emory University; Deqiang Qiu, Emory University
• Journal Title: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
• Volume: Volume 90, Number 4
• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons | 2023-05-30, Pages 1414-1430
• Type of Work: Article | Post-print: After Peer Review
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29722
• Subjects: Biology, Biostatistics; Biology, Neuroscience
• Keywords: Approximate message passing; Compressive sensing; Outlier modeling; Parameter estimation; Quantitative susceptibility mapping

Abstract

Purpose: For quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), the lack of ground-truth in clinical settings makes it challenging to determine suitable parameters for the dipole inversion. We propose a probabilistic Bayesian approach for QSM with built-in parameter estimation, and incorporate the nonlinear formulation of the dipole inversion to achieve a robust recovery of the susceptibility maps. Theory: From a Bayesian perspective, the image wavelet coefficients are approximately sparse and modelled by the Laplace distribution. The measurement noise is modelled by a Gaussian-mixture distribution with two components, where the second component is used to model the noise outliers. Through probabilistic inference, the susceptibility map and distribution parameters can be jointly recovered using approximate message passing (AMP). Methods: We compare our proposed AMP with built-in parameter estimation (AMP-PE) to the state-of-the-art L1-QSM, FANSI and MEDI approaches on the simulated and in vivo datasets, and perform experiments to explore the optimal settings of AMP-PE. Reproducible code is available at https://github.com/EmoryCN2L/QSM_AMP_PE Results: On the simulated Sim2Snr1 dataset, AMP-PE achieved the lowest NRMSE, DFCM and the highest SSIM, while MEDI achieved the lowest HFEN. On the in vivo datasets, AMP-PE is robust and successfully recovers the susceptibility maps using the estimated parameters, whereas L1-QSM, FANSI and MEDI typically require additional visual fine-tuning to select or double-check working parameters. Conclusion: AMP-PE provides automatic and adaptive parameter estimation for QSM and avoids the subjectivity from the visual fine-tuning step, making it an excellent choice for the clinical setting.