About this item:

46 Views | 30 Downloads

Author Notes:

arbib@usc.edu (M.A. Arbib)

The authors declare that they have no Conflicts of Interest.

Arbib, Fragaszy, and Healy are grateful for Dietrich Stout's hospitality in Atlanta. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful critiques of an earlier draft.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This article is based in part on the ABLE (Action, Brain, Language, Evolution) mini-workshop on “Construction, Tools and Language” held at Emory University, Atlanta, November 2019, which was supported in part by the Center for Mind, Brain, and Culture at Emory University and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BCS-1343544 “INSPIRE Track 1: Action, Vision and Language, and their Brain Mechanisms in Evolutionary Relationship” (Michael A. Arbib, Principal Investigator).

Keywords:

  • "how" versus "what"
  • Acheulean tool making
  • bird nest construction
  • capuchin nut cracking
  • construction (additive/subtractive)
  • hafted tools
  • image and assemblage
  • language evolution
  • mirror systems hypothesis
  • motor programs
  • Oldowan tool making
  • pantomime
  • postconditions
  • preconditions
  • technological pedagogy hypothesis
  • tool use
  • tooling

Tooling and Construction: From Nut-Cracking and Stone-Tool Making to Bird Nests and Language

Tools:

Journal Title:

Current Research in Behavioral Sciences

Volume:

Volume 5

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

The present paper provides an integrative theory of actions and motor programs for skill in tool use, construction, and language. We analyze preconditions for action as well as making their effects (postconditions) explicit, emphasizing the “how” of action details as well as the “what” of motor programs, aided by conceptual analysis of several brain modeling efforts. The theory is exemplified by analysis of the subtractive construction involved in percussive tooling by capuchin monkeys and Oldowan and Acheulean stone tool making by protohumans before turning to the additive construction of hafted tools. A complementary analysis focused on the construction of bird nests explores the notion of “image” and “stage” in construction. We offer a brief comparison with birdsong before arguing for a very different relation between communication and construction in humans. Pantomime lifts manipulation from practical to communicative action in protohumans, and we consider the role of pedagogy before offering hypotheses on the emergence of human language that suggest how language may have evolved from manual skills. We note that language provides an open-ended means for devising innovations in tool use and construction, but reiterate the importance of this framework for diverse future studies in ethology and comparative psychology.

Copyright information:

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Export to EndNote