About this item:

50 Views | 31 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Matthew C. Freeman, Email: matthew.freeman@emory.edu, https://www.FreemanResearchGroup.org.

Author contributions: CE, KAH, AE, SD, MCF, MS, WK, AB, and RAB: project conceptualization and methodology; KAH, KR, EAO, CC, MCF, WK, MS, and RAB: investigation and data curation; CE, EAO, KAH, KR, ZS, CJ, CY, MCF, and RAB: formal analysis; EAO, ZS, KAH, KR, AE, CJ, and CY: writing — original; EAO, CE, ZS, KAH, KR, AE, CY, CC, AB, MCF, and RAB: writing — review and editing; all authors provided approval of the submitted version.

Acknowledgements: We thank the Center for Molecular Dynamics, Nepal (CMDN), the Institut de Recherche en Santé de Surveillance Epidemiologique et de Formation (IRESSEF) in Dakar, Senegal, and the Center for Family Health Research in Zambia for their partnership in this study. We gratefully acknowledge the participants who gave their time and insights to help us better understand Nepal’s, Senegal’s, and Zambia’s vaccine delivery system, along with facilitators from the Ministry of Health and Population, Department of Health Services, and the Family Welfare Division of Nepal, Ministry of Health and Social Action in Senegal, and the Ministry of Health in Zambia for supporting this research. In addition, we thank Sarah Chesemore, Anna Rapp, Tove Ryman, and Ethan Wong from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Kate Buellesbach, Nancy Fullman, Nathaniel Gerthe, Gloria Ikilezi, Caitlyn Mason, David Phillips, and Oliver Rothschild, Jordan-Tate Thomas, and Angela Wang from Gates Ventures for technical support; and the Vaccine Exemplars Research Advisory Group for their insights, specifically Agnes Binagwaho, Laura Craw, Carolina Danovaro, Anuradha Gupta, Heidi Larson, Penelope Masumbu, Kate O’Brien, Helen Rees, Lora Shimp, and Aaron Wallace.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA (OPP1195041) with a planning grant from Gates Ventures, LLC, Kirkland, WA.

Keywords:

  • childhood immunization
  • exemplars
  • implementation science
  • routine immunization
  • immunization coverage

Drivers of early childhood vaccination success in Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia: a multiple case study analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Implementation Science Communications

Volume:

Volume 4

Publisher:

, Pages 109-None

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Introduction The fundamental components of a vaccine delivery system are well-documented, but robust evidence is needed on how the related processes and implementation strategies — including the facilitators and barriers — contribute to improvements in childhood vaccination coverage. The purpose of this study was to identify critical facilitators and barriers to the implementation of common interventions across three countries that have dramatically increased coverage of early childhood vaccination over the past 20 years, and to qualify common or divergent themes in their success. Methods We conducted 278 key informant interviews and focus group discussions with public health leaders at the regional, district, and local levels and community members in Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia to identify intervention activities and the facilitators and barriers to implementation. We used thematic analysis grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs of inner and outer settings to identify immunization program key facilitators and barriers. Results We found that the common facilitators to program implementation across the countries were the CFIR inner setting constructs of (1) networks and communications, (2) goals and feedback, (3) relative priority, and (4) readiness for implementation and outer setting constructs of (5) cosmopolitanism and (6) external policies and mandates. The common barriers were incentives and rewards, available resources, access to knowledge and information, and patients’ needs and resources. Critical to the success of these national immunization programs were prioritization and codification of health as a human right, clear chain of command and shared ownership of immunization, communication of program goals and feedback, offering of incentives at multiple levels, training of staff central to vaccination education, the provision of resources to support the program, key partnerships and guidance on implementation and adoption of vaccination policies. Conclusion Adequate organizational commitment, resources, communication, training, and partnerships were the most critical facilitators for these countries to improve childhood vaccination.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2023

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote