About this item:

51 Views | 30 Downloads

Author Notes:

Bhavin B. Adhyaru, MS, MD, FACP, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; badhyar@emory.edu

We thank the IT clinical operations team at GHS for contributing to developing education materials. We also thank our Epic partnership, in helping with the development phase of this project.

BBA, GH, and KM contributed to the design of the work. MO helped with the acquisition and analysis of the data for the work. All authors helped in the interpretation of the data. Additionally, all authors reviewed the work critically, agreed on the final version to be published, and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

Conflict of interests: None declared.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Keywords:

  • electronic acknowledgment
  • ICU
  • push notification
  • EHR

Push notifications for critical labs results: a pilot study in the intensive care unit (ICU)

Tools:

Journal Title:

JAMIA Open

Volume:

Volume 6, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages ooad058-None

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Objective We developed a push notification allowing for an electronic acknowledgment of critical lab results to providers in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods This project was conducted over a 3-month period at a large academic safety net hospital. A push notification and acknowledgment system were created to comply with the existing critical results notification requirements. We monitored the number of acknowledged results, time to acknowledgment, and lab type. Results Prior to the push notification, lab services paged the provider. This resulted in many critical lab results relayed to the clinician beyond the expected 10-minute window. With the push notification workflow, we found that, during the 3-month period, 82, or 5.8%, of the 1414 results were acknowledged. This represented 82 less pages/calls lab services had to make. Discussion The push notification alert was easy to use and there was quicker results notification when acknowledged. There were limitations due to hand-offs for clinicians and some were not familiar with the mobile technology and the electronic acknowledgment. Conclusions Although the acknowledgment rate was low, every electronic acknowledgment saved lab service technicians an average of 10 minutes compared to the existing workflow. As familiarity with the technology and workflow increases, this novel form of communication has the potential to have significant cost savings for lab services, in addition to efficiency gains for lab, clinicians, and more timely care. The integration of health information technology and push notification of critical labs should be the focus of investigation for further future research.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote