Pediatric kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries show no increased risk of complications compared to single renal artery grafts

• Authors: Juliano Riella, Emory University; Marina M. Tabbara, University of Miami; Angel Alvarez, University of Miami; Marissa J. DeFreitas, University of Miami; Jayanthi Chandar, University of Miami; Jeffrey J. Gaynor, University of Miami; Javier Gonzalez, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón; Gaetano Ciancio, University of Miami
• Journal Title: FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
• Volume: Volume 10
• Publisher: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA | 2022-12-16, Pages 1058823-1058823
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1058823
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Pediatrics; pediatric kidney transplantation; multiple renal arteries; surgical technique; vascular reconstruction; liver mobilization technique; COHORT

Abstract

Background: Kidney allografts with multiple renal arteries (MRA) are not infrequent and have been historically associated with a higher risk of developing vascular and urologic complications. Reports of kidney transplantation using MRA allografts in the pediatric population remain scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate if transplantation of allografts with MRA with a surgical intent of creating a single arterial inflow using vascular reconstruction techniques when required, and without the routine use of surgical drains or ureteral stents, is associated with an increased risk of complications when compared to single renal artery (SRA) grafts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all pediatric renal transplant recipients performed by a single surgeon at our center between January 2015 and June 2022. Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and recipient outcomes were included. Recipients were divided into two groups based on SRA vs. MRA. Baseline variables were described using frequency distributions for categorical variables and means and standard errors for continuous variables. Comparisons of those distributions between the two groups were performed using standard chi-squared and t-tests. Time-to-event distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Forty-nine pediatric transplant recipients were analyzed. Of these, 9 had donors with MRA (Group 1) and 40 had donors with SRA (Group 2). Native kidney and liver mobilization was performed in 44.4% (4/9) of Group 1 vs. 60.0% (24/40) of Group 2 cases (p = 0.39). There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft primary nonfunction. No surgical drainage or ureteral stents were used in any of the cases. One patient in Group 2 developed a distal ureter stricture. The geometric mean serum creatinine at 6- and 12-months posttransplant was 0.7 */ 1.2 and 0.9 */ 1.2 mg/dl in Group 1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 mg/dl in Group 2. Two death-censored graft failures were observed in Group 2, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (p = 0.48). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pediatric renal transplantation with MRA grafts, using a surgical approach to achieve a single renal artery ostium, can be safely performed while achieving similar outcomes as SRA grafts and with a low complication rate.