About this item:

45 Views | 15 Downloads

Author Notes:

Asya Agulnik, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mail Stop 721, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. asya.agulnik@stjude.org

We thank the PEWS implementation team at all Proyecto EVAT centers, including those who participated in this study, as well as the Proyecto EVAT Steering Committee for oversight of this work.

Subject:

Keywords:

  • Pediatric Early Warning Systems
  • behavioral science
  • clinical cancer research
  • clinical management
  • implementation science
  • pediatric cancer
  • resource-limited
  • stages of change
  • transtheoretical model
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Medical Oncology
  • Neoplasms
  • Clinical Deterioration
  • Hospitals

Stages of change: Strategies to promote use of a Pediatric Early Warning System in resource-limited pediatric oncology centers

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Cancer Medicine

Volume:

Volume 12, Number 14

Publisher:

, Pages 15358-15370

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) assist early detection of clinical deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer. Relevant to successful PEWS implementation, the “stages of change” model characterizes stakeholder support for PEWS based on willingness and effort to adopt the new practice. Methods: At five resource-limited pediatric oncology centers in Latin America, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 71 hospital staff involved in PEWS implementation. Purposive sampling was used to select centers requiring variable time to complete PEWS implementation, with low-barrier centers (3–4 months) and high-barrier centers (10–11 months). Interviews were conducted in Spanish, professionally transcribed, and translated into English. Thematic content analysis explored “stage of change” with constant comparative analysis across stakeholder types and study sites. Results: Participants identified six interventions (training, incentives, participation, evidence, persuasion, and modeling) and two policies (environmental planning and mandates) as effective strategies used by implementation leaders to promote stakeholder progression through stages of change. Key approaches involved presentation of evidence demonstrating PEWS effectiveness, persuasion and incentives addressing specific stakeholder interests, enthusiastic individuals serving as models for others, and policies enforced by hospital directors facilitating habitual PEWS use. Effective engagement targeted hospital directors during early implementation phases to provide programmatic legitimacy for clinical staff. Conclusion: This study identifies strategies to promote adoption and maintained use of PEWS, highlighting the importance of tailoring implementation strategies to the motivations of each stakeholder type. These findings can guide efforts to implement PEWS and other evidence-based practices that improve childhood cancer outcomes in resource-limited hospitals.

Copyright information:

© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote