About this item:

37 Views | 23 Downloads

Author Notes:

Juan J. Andino, MD, MBA. Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Urology-The Men’s Clinic, 1260 15th St., Suite 1200, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Email: juanjose@umich.edu

(I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: JJ Andino, NW Eyrich; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: JJ Andino, NW Eyrich; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://mhealth.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/mhealth-23-15/coif). RJB serves as an unpaid editorial board member of mHealth from March 2023 to February 2025. RJB is a consultant at Pager, Intercept Telehealth, and UpScript. They are telemedicine companies. He gets options from all three companies and also cash compensation from Intercept Telehealth; he is an expert in Urology for an occasional law firm; he has a patent on a catheter, but he has never gotten compensation for it; he was appointed by President Biden to the National Cancer Advisory Board and is compensated for the several days per year that he is in Washington to attend meetings at the National Cancer Institute. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Funding: None.

Keywords:

  • Telemedicine
  • telehealth
  • COVID-19
  • pandemic

Overview of telehealth in the United States since the COVID-19 public health emergency: a narrative review

Tools:

Journal Title:

JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Volume:

Volume 9

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background and Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency (PHE) resulted in rapid expansion and use of telehealth services. Regulatory and reimbursement flexibilities were put in place to ensure patients had continued access to care while the health system was overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases. These changes have allowed clinicians to use and researchers to evaluate telehealth in new ways. Methods This narrative review focuses on highlighting telehealth research and evaluation that took place from March 2020 to February 2023 in the outpatient setting of the United States healthcare system. Key Content and Findings The research conducted during the COVID-19 PHE shows that telehealth was primarily used as a substitute for in-person care, to maintain continuity of care for established patients, and has not had a negative impact on clinical outcomes or resulted in increasing healthcare costs. Conclusions Studies show high patient and physician satisfaction, similar clinical outcomes and suggest that telehealth is used as a substitute for in-person care. The findings of this narrative review have direct implications for key stakeholders using telehealth now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients, physicians and providers, healthcare leaders and administrators, as well as policymakers should consider how telehealth should continue to be reimbursed and regulated even as the COVID-19 PHE expired in May 2023.

Copyright information:

2023 mHealth. All rights reserved.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Export to EndNote