About this item:

48 Views | 26 Downloads

Author Notes:

Mary E. Dillhoff, mary.dillhoff@osumc.edu

AD, EWB, AGL, GP, EM, FGR, ZK, SRK, VRR, RCF, BAK, KI, PMS, HN, MB, SKM, TMP, CRS, and MD contributed to the conception and design of this work and acquisition of data. EWB, AD, CRS, and MD performed data analysis and interpretation of the data and prepared the manuscript. AD, EWB, AGL, GP, EM, FGR, ZK, SRK, VRR, RCF, BAK, KI, PMS, HN, MB,SKM, TMP, CRS, and MD revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, approved the final version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Subjects:

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • Surgery
  • ACS NSQIP risk calculator
  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
  • PNET
  • Pan-NET
  • CARDIAC RISK
  • MORTALITY
  • FISTULA
  • PREDICTION
  • OUTCOMES
  • MODELS
  • INDEX
  • SCORE

Evaluating the ACS NSQIP Risk Calculator in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY

Volume:

Volume 23, Number 11

Publisher:

, Pages 2225-2231

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background: In a changing health care environment where patient outcomes will be more closely scrutinized, the ability to predict surgical complications is becoming increasingly important. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) online risk calculator is a popular tool to predict surgical risk. This paper aims to assess the applicability of the ACS NSQIP calculator to patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Methods: Using the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (USNET-SG), 890 patients who underwent pancreatic procedures between 1/1/2000–12/31/2016 were evaluated. Predicted and actual outcomes were compared using C-statistics and Brier scores. Results: The most commonly performed procedure was distal pancreatectomy, followed by standard and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. For the entire group of patients studied, C-statistics were highest for discharge destination (0.79) and cardiac complications (0.71), and less than 0.7 for all other complications. The Brier scores for surgical site infection (0.1441) and discharge to nursing/rehabilitation facility (0.0279) were below the Brier score cut-off, while the rest were equal to or above and therefore not useful for interpretation. Conclusion: This work indicates that the ACS NSQIP risk calculator is a valuable tool that should be used with caution and in coordination with clinical assessment for PNET clinical decision-making.
Export to EndNote