About this item:

71 Views | 32 Downloads

Author Notes:

R. L. Bromley, rebecca.bromley@manchester.ac.uk

All authors contributed to the expert working group process. RB and MB-D drafted the manuscript which was revised by the other authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

To the Stakeholders who identified the core themes this process investigated. Dr Dipak Kalra, Professor of Health Informatics, UCL for acting as the virtual meeting chair and to Dr Cerian Jackson, Clinical Psychologist for her technical assistance during the virtual meeting.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work has been completed as part of the ConcePTION study. The ConcePTION project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 821520. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EFPIA.

Keywords:

  • pharmacovigilance
  • medicines
  • pregnancy
  • neurodevelopment
  • neurobehavior
  • teratogens
  • in utero exposure

Expert consensus on neurodevelopmental outcomes in pregnancy pharmacovigilance studies

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Frontiers in Pharmacology

Volume:

Volume 14

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Exposure in utero to certain medications can disrupt processes of fetal development, including brain development, leading to a continuum of neurodevelopmental difficulties. Recognizing the deficiency of neurodevelopmental investigations within pregnancy pharmacovigilance, an international Neurodevelopmental Expert Working Group was convened to achieve consensus regarding the core neurodevelopmental outcomes, optimization of methodological approaches and barriers to conducting pregnancy pharmacovigilance studies with neurodevelopmental outcomes. Methods: A modified Delphi study was undertaken based on stakeholder and expert input. Stakeholders (patient, pharmaceutical, academic and regulatory) were invited to define topics, pertaining to neurodevelopmental investigations in medication-exposed pregnancies. Experts were identified for their experience regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes following medicinal, substances of misuse or environmental exposures in utero. Two questionnaire rounds and a virtual discussion meeting were used to explore expert opinion on the topics identified by the stakeholders. Results: Twenty-five experts, from 13 countries and professionally diverse backgrounds took part in the development of 11 recommendations. The recommendations focus on the importance of neurodevelopment as a core feature of pregnancy pharmacovigilance, the timing of study initiation and a core set of distinct but interrelated neurodevelopmental skills or diagnoses which require investigation. Studies should start in infancy with an extended period of investigation into adolescence, with more frequent sampling during rapid periods of development. Additionally, recommendations are made regarding optimal approach to neurodevelopmental outcome measurement, comparator groups, exposure factors, a core set of confounding and mediating variables, attrition, reporting of results and the required improvements in funding for potential later emerging effects. Different study designs will be required depending on the specific neurodevelopmental outcome type under investigation and whether the medicine in question is newly approved or already in widespread use. Conclusion: An improved focus on neurodevelopmental outcomes is required within pregnancy pharmacovigilance. These expert recommendations should be met across a complementary set of studies which converge to form a comprehensive set of evidence regarding neurodevelopmental outcomes in pregnancy pharmacovigilance.

Copyright information:

© 2023 Bromley, Bickle Graz, Bluett-Duncan, Chambers, Damkier, Dietrich, Dolk, Grant, Mattson, Meador, Nordeng, Oberlander, Ornoy, Revet, Richardson, Rovet, Schuler-Faccini, Smearman, Simms, Vorhees, Wide, Wood, Yates, Ystrom, Supraja and Adams.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote