About this item:

21 Views | 8 Downloads

Author Notes:

Kartavya J Vyas, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Claudia Nance Rollins Building, Room 4020C, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Email: kvyas4@emory.edu

The author would like to acknowledge the support of the Southeast Regional AHEC Scholars Learning Collaborative, particularly Anne M. Wenders of the University of South Florida AHEC program, Glenda J. Stanley of the Alabama Statewide AHEC program, and Jennifer Bailey of the South Carolina AHEC consortium. The author would also like to express his sincere appreciation for the guidance received from Dr. Julie A. Gazmararian of Emory University.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Subject:

Research Funding:

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under grant UB6HP31680, Public Health Training Centers for $4,348,992. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS, or the US Government.

Keywords:

  • program evaluation
  • education
  • rural health
  • health professional

Review of the Area Health Education Center Scholars Didactic Curricula: A Federal Program for Students Interested in Rural Health

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

Volume:

Volume 10

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

The objective of this review is to critically evaluate the Area Health Education Center Scholars' didactic curricula and determine whether the goal of developing a sustainable rural healthcare workforce is achievable under the program. The didactic curricula from the Alabama, Florida, and South Carolina programs were evaluated using a context-input-process-product model and a mixed-methods approach. Modules were assessed for their content and mode of delivery, and whether the eight competency domains from the Council on Education for Public Health were incorporated. Student evaluations from the 2019–2020 cohort were also examined to identify themes from each module. On average, across modules, nearly all students strongly agreed or agreed that the facilitator had been responsive (97%); that the modules had been clearly outlined (95%), easy to understand (96%), not overly time-consumptive (96%), and relatable to their career (96%); and felt that their understanding had improved (97%) and felt satisfied overall (96%). Some argued, however, that parts of the content may have been lengthy and dense, and that there were insufficient materials tailored toward healthcare professionals, including the cultural barriers of populations they are expected to attend to and actionable ways to advocate for patients. Public health policy, leadership, and communication competencies were noticeably absent in several modules. It is recommended that modules be amended to include components that students felt were instructive. It is also suggested that a committee standardize the core curricula; local programs may then tailor them as needed.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2023

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Export to EndNote