"A daily reminder of an ugly incident horizontal ellipsis ": analysis of debate on rape and incest exceptions in early abortion ban legislation in six states in the southern US

• Authors: Dabney Evans, Emory University; Liesl Schnabel, Emory University; Kathryn Wyckoff, Emory University; Subasri Narasimhan, Emory University
• Journal Title: SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS
• Volume: Volume 31, Number 1
• Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | 2023-12-31, Pages 2198283-2198283
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2198283
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Public Health; Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; abortion; reproductive justice; rape; incest; sexual violence; gender-based violence; SEXUAL ASSAULT; METAANALYSIS

Abstract

Abortion bans in the United States often include provisions for abortion in the circumstances of rape or incest experience. Such exceptions have been included in important legislation like the Hyde Amendment, 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, 2010 Affordable Care Act, and state and federal legislation banning abortion in early gestation. Thus, examination of these laws is critical given the 2022 Supreme Court decision to devolve legal access to the state level. This study examines arguments made by proponents and opponents of rape and incest exceptions within early abortion ban legislation using publicly available video archives from legislative sessions in six Southern states. A narrative analysis was conducted on the legislative debate of rape and incest exceptions during the 2018–2019 legislative sessions. We found three core themes when examining legislative debate: belief in people’s claims underpinned opposition or support for exceptions; opinions about trauma were related to views on exceptions; and exception supporters called for empathy and non-partisanship in consideration of rape and incest. Additionally, support and opposition for the inclusion of rape and incest exceptions in draft law did not follow party lines. This study seeks to deepen understanding of the strategies used by legislators to promote and rebuff rape and incest exceptions in early abortion legislation while providing greater opportunity for tailored reproductive health, rights, and justice advocacy and policy, especially in the context of the US South where abortion access is now extremely restricted.