About this item:

77 Views | 35 Downloads

Author Notes:

Jesse L. Berry, MD, Director of Ocular Oncology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90027. Email: jesse.berry@med.usc.edu

Conception and design: Xu, Berry Analysis and interpretation: Im, Pike, Reid, Peng, Xu, Berry Data Collection: Im, Pike, Peng, Grossniklaus, Hubbard, Skalet, Bellsmith, Shields, Lally, Stacey, Reiser, Nagiel, Shah, Xu, Berry Obtained funding: N/A Overall responsibility: Im, Pike, Reid, Peng, Sirivolu, Grossniklaus, Hubbard, Skalet, Bellsmith, Shields, Lally, Stacey, Reiser, Nagiel, Shah, Xu, Berry

The authors would like to acknowledge Brianne Brown for the coordination of this study.

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE disclosures form.

Subject:

Research Funding:

J.L.B.: Research support – National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health Award Number K08CA232344, The Wright Foundation, Children’s Oncology Group/ St. Baldrick’s Foundation, Danhakl Family Foundation, Hyundai Hope on Wheels, Childhood Eye Cancer Trust, Children’s Cancer Research Fund, A. Linn Murphree, MD, Chair in Ocular Oncology, The Berle & Lucy Adams Chair in Cancer Research, The Larry and Celia Moh Foundation, The Institute for Families, Inc, Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

L.X.: Research support – The Knights Templar Eye Foundation.

A.N.: Research support – NIH K08EY030924, the Las Madrinas Endowment in Experimental Therapeutics for Ophthalmology, Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award, Knights Templar Eye Foundation Endowment.

H.E.G.: Research support – NIH R01 EY028450.

G.B.H.: Research support – the National Eye Institute as Protocol Co-Chair for studies on retinopathy of prematurity (ROP3 and ROP4 Trials).

The sponsors or funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Drs Alison Skalet and Kellyn Bellsmith are supported by grant P30 EY010572, from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), and by unrestricted departmental funding from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY).

Keywords:

  • Aqueous humor
  • Circulating analytes
  • Liquid biopsy
  • Multicenter
  • Retinoblastoma

A Multicenter Analysis of Nucleic Acid Quantification Using Aqueous Humor Liquid Biopsy in Retinoblastoma: Implications for Clinical Testing

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Ophthalmology Science

Volume:

Volume 3, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 100289-100289

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Purpose: Retinoblastoma (RB) is most often diagnosed with clinical features and not diagnosed with tumor biopsy. This study describes tumor-derived analyte concentrations from aqueous humor (AH) liquid biopsy and its use in clinical assays. Design: Case series study. Participants: Sixty-two RB eyes from 55 children and 14 control eyes from 12 children from 4 medical centers. Methods: This study included 128 RB AH samples including: diagnostic (DX) samples, samples from eyes undergoing treatment (TX), samples after completing treatment (END), and during bevacizumab injection for radiation therapy after completing RB treatment (BEV). Fourteen-control AH were analyzed for unprocessed analytes (double-stranded DNA [dsDNA], single-stranded DNA [ssDNA], micro-RNA [miRNA], RNA, and protein) with Qubit fluorescence assays. Double-stranded DNA from 2 RB AH samples underwent low-pass whole-genome sequencing to detect somatic copy number alterations. Logistic regression was used to predict disease burden given analyte concentrations. Main Outcome Measures: Unprocessed analyte (dsDNA, ssDNA, miRNA, RNA and protein) concentrations. Results: Results revealed dsDNA, ssDNA, miRNA, and proteins, but not RNA, were quantifiable in most samples (up to 98%) with Qubit fluorescence assays. Median dsDNA concentration was significantly higher in DX (3.08 ng/μl) compared to TX (0.18 ng/μl; P < 0.0001) at an order of 17 times greater and 20 times greater than END samples (0.15 ng/μl; P = 0.001). Using logistic regression, nucleic acid concentrations were useful in predicting higher versus lower RB disease burden. Retinoblastoma somatic copy number alterations were identified in a TX, but not in a BEV sample, indicating the correlation with RB activity. Conclusions: Aqueous humor liquid biopsy in RB is a high-yield source of dsDNA, ssDNA, miRNA, and protein. Diagnostic samples are most useful for RB 1 gene mutational analyses. Genomic analysis may be more informative of tumor activity status than quantification alone and can be performed even with smaller analyte concentrations obtained from TX samples. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Copyright information:

American Academy of Ophthalmology

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Export to EndNote