About this item:

36 Views | 9 Downloads

Author Notes:

Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater, PhD, Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, 404-712-8330. Email: hilary.e.miller@emory.edu

Thank you to the families who participated in this research, as well as the research assistants who aided in data collection and coding. Funding for participant recruitment was provided by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health (R03-HD067481) to Vanessa R. Simmering and the Waisman Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center grant (P30-HD03352). Subsets of the data (4-year-old sample) are published in Miller et al. (2016). Additionally, a subset of data was presented at the 73rd Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Data collection and coding were conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. However, manuscript writing was conducted during Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater’s current affiliation at Emory University and Vanessa R. Simmering’s current affiliation at Doctrina Consulting, LLC.

Subject:

Keywords:

  • spatial cognition
  • language production
  • reference frame selection
  • spatial words
  • child development

Examining the role of external language support and children’s own language use in spatial development

Tools:

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY

Volume:

Volume 215

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

This research investigated whether an experimental manipulation providing children with external language support reflects developmental processes whereby children come to use language within spatial tasks. One hundred and twenty-one 3- to 6-year-old children participated in language production and spatial recall tasks. The Production task measured children’s task-relevant descriptions of spatial relations on the testing array. The Recall task assessed children’s delayed search for hidden object locations on the testing array relative to one or more spatial reference frames (egocentric, room-centered, and intrinsic). During the Recall task, the experimenter provided children with either descriptive or non-descriptive verbal cues. Results showed that children’s task-relevant language production improved with age and the effects of language support on spatial performance decreased with age. However, children’s production of task-relevant language did not account for effects of language support. Instead, children benefited from language support, irrespective of their task-relevant language production. These results suggest that verbal encoding is not a spontaneous process that young children use in support of their spatial performance. Additionally, experimental manipulations of language support are not fully reflective of the ways in which children come to use language within spatial tasks.

Copyright information:

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Export to EndNote