About this item:

46 Views | 25 Downloads

Author Notes:

Anita V Devineni, anita.devineni@emory.edu

Formal analysis, Investigation, behavioral experiments; brain dissections and immunostaining. Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, connectome analysis. Formal analysis, Investigation, behavioral experiments. Formal analysis, Investigation, behavioral experiments; brain dissections and immunostaining. Investigation, behavioral experiments. Formal analysis, Investigation, behavioral experiments. Formal analysis, Methodology, behavioral experiments. Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, brain dissection and immunostaining; calcium imaging.

We thank Richard Axel for his generous support and helpful discussions. We thank Barbara Noro for general advice, sharing unpublished fly lines and code, and providing manuscript feedback. We thank Katie Shakman for the initial setup of the behavioral arena and some analysis code, Tanya Tabachnik and Rick Hormigo for technical assistance with the behavioral arena, Pavel Masek for help with setting up the optoPAD, Jan Hawes for assistance with setting up a new lab, and Deepti Suchindran and Crystal Wang for assisting with pilot experiments in the new lab. We thank Yu-Chieh David Chen and Chris Rodgers for comments on the manuscript. We thank John Carlson, Gilad Barnea, the Janelia Research Center, and the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC) for providing fly strains. This work was supported by internal funding to the Axel lab, startup funding from Emory University (AVD), and a grant from the Whitehall Foundation (AVD).

No competing interests declared.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This paper was supported by the following grant:

Whitehall Foundation 2022-08-017 to Anita V Devineni.

Keywords:

  • D. melanogaster
  • feeding
  • neural circuits
  • neuroscience
  • sensory processing
  • taste
  • Animals
  • Taste
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • Taste Perception
  • Drosophila
  • Brain

Selective integration of diverse taste inputs within a single taste modality

Tools:

Journal Title:

eLife

Volume:

Volume 12

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

A fundamental question in sensory processing is how different channels of sensory input are processed to regulate behavior. Different input channels may converge onto common downstream pathways to drive the same behaviors, or they may activate separate pathways to regulate distinct behaviors. We investigated this question in the Drosophila bitter taste system, which contains diverse bitter-sensing cells residing in different taste organs. First, we optogenetically activated subsets of bitter neurons within each organ. These subsets elicited broad and highly overlapping behavioral effects, suggesting that they converge onto common downstream pathways, but we also observed behavioral differences that argue for biased convergence. Consistent with these results, transsynaptic tracing revealed that bitter neurons in different organs connect to overlapping downstream pathways with biased connectivity. We investigated taste processing in one type of downstream bitter neuron that projects to the higher brain. These neurons integrate input from multiple organs and regulate specific taste-related behaviors. We then traced downstream circuits, providing the first glimpse into taste processing in the higher brain. Together, these results reveal that different bitter inputs are selectively integrated early in the circuit, enabling the pooling of information, while the circuit then diverges into multiple pathways that may have different roles.

Copyright information:

© 2023, Deere et al

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote