About this item:

68 Views | 27 Downloads

Author Notes:

Yong Teng, Email: yong.teng@emory.edu

YT conceived, designed, and supervised this study. LG, FY, DT, ZX, YT, DY, and DS performed the experiments. LG and FY analyzed and interpreted the data. YT and LG wrote the manuscript with input with ZC. The corresponding author attests that all listed authors meet authorship criteria. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

We appreciate Dr. Anthea Hammond for critical reading of the manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by the grant funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203593 (to LG), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing cstc2021jcyj-bsh0239 (to LG), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission KJQN202101326 (to LG).

This work was also supported in part by Winship Invest$ Team Science Award (to YT).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • ENO2
  • PKM2
  • HNSCC
  • Glucose metabolism
  • Cell cycle
  • AP-III-a4
  • SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA
  • PYRUVATE-KINASE M2
  • PKM2 PROMOTES
  • BETA-CATENIN
  • METABOLISM
  • ENOLASE
  • TRANSACTIVATION
  • PROLIFERATION
  • ACTIVATION
  • INHIBITOR

Mediation of PKM2-dependent glycolytic and non-glycolytic pathways by ENO2 in head and neck cancer development

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH

Volume:

Volume 42, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 1-1

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Enolase 2 (ENO2) is a crucial glycolytic enzyme in cancer metabolic process and acts as a “moonlighting” protein to play various functions in diverse cellular processes unrelated to glycolysis. ENO2 is highly expressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tissues relative to normal tissues; however, its impact and underlying regulatory mechanisms in HNSCC malignancy remain unclear. Methods: Molecular alterations were examined by bioinformatics, qRT-PCR, western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation, and ChIP-PCR assays. Metabolic changes were assessed by intracellular levels of ATP and glucose. Animal study was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the ENO inhibitor. Results: ENO2 is required for HNSCC cell proliferation and glycolysis, which, surprisingly, is partially achieved by controlling PKM2 protein stability and its nuclear translocation. Mechanistically, loss of ENO2 expression promotes PKM2 protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and prevents the switch of cytoplasmic PKM2 to the nucleus by inactivating AKT signaling, leading to a blockade in PKM2-mediated glycolytic flux and CCND1-associated cell cycle progression. In addition, treatment with the ENO inhibitor AP-III-a4 significantly induces HNSCC remission in a preclinical mouse model. Conclusion: Our work elucidates the signaling basis underlying ENO2-dependent HNSCC development, providing evidence to establish a novel ENO2-targeted therapy for treating HNSCC.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2022

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote