About this item:

72 Views | 16 Downloads

Author Notes:

Sarah N. Mattson, Ph.D., 6330 Alvarado Court, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92120, Phone: 619-594-7228, Fax: 619-594-1895. Email: sarah.mattson@sdsu.edu

The authors thank the families who graciously participate in our studies. The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

All or part of this work was done in conjunction with the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD), which is funded by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Additional information about CIFASD can be found at www.cifasd.org.

Research described in this paper was supported by NIAAA grant number U01 AA014834. Additional support was provided by U24 AA014811, U24 AA014815, T32 AA013525.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Substance Abuse
  • behavior
  • diagnosis
  • fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
  • identification
  • prenatal alcohol exposure
  • risk score
  • SPECTRUM DISORDERS
  • NEUROBEHAVIORAL PROFILE
  • PHYSICAL FEATURES
  • ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR
  • FETAL

Development and validation of a postnatal risk score that identifies children with prenatal alcohol exposure

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

Volume:

Volume 46, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 52-65

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background: This study aimed to develop an efficient and easily calculable risk score that can be used to identify an individual's risk of having been exposed to alcohol prenatally. Methods: Data for this study were collected as part of the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, Phases 2 and 3. Two cohorts (ages 5 to 17 years) completed a comprehensive neurobehavioral battery and a standard dysmorphology exam: a development cohort (DC; n = 325) and a comparative cohort (CC; n = 523). Both cohorts included two groups: those with histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (AE-DC, n = 121; AE-CC, n = 177) and a control group that included subjects with minimal or no prenatal alcohol exposure (CON-DC, n = 204; CON-CC, n = 346). Behavioral assessments and physical exam data were combined using regression techniques to derive a risk score indicating the likelihood of prenatal alcohol exposure. Subjects were then divided into two subgroups: (1) low risk and (2) high risk. Chi-square (χ2) determined classification accuracy and ROC curves were produced to assess the predictive accuracy. Correlations between risk scores and intelligence quotient and executive function scores were calculated. Results: Subjects were accurately classified in the DC (χ2 = 78.61, p < 0.001) and CC (χ2 = 86.63, p < 0.001). The classification model also performed well in the DC (ROC = 0.835 [SE = 0.024, p < 0.001]) and CC (ROC = 0.786 [SE = 0.021, p < 0.001]). In the AE-CC and CON-CC, there were modest but significant associations between the risk score and executive function (AE-CC: r = −0.20, p = 0.034; CON-CC: r = −0.28, p < 0.001) and intelligence quotient (AE-CC: r = −0.20, p = 0.034; CON-CC: r = −0.28, p < 0.001). Conclusion(s): The risk score significantly distinguished alcohol-exposed from control subjects and correlated with important cognitive outcomes. It has significant clinical potential and could be easily deployed in clinical settings.
Export to EndNote