About this item:

66 Views | 31 Downloads

Author Notes:

Ithaar Derweesh, iderweesh@gmail.com

ID and CK contributed to the conception and design of the study. DP, VM, and YF contributed to the acquisition of patients. CK, MM, RD, NM, DP, KS, AW, FL, SD, AS, and HT organized the database. CK and ID wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Subject:

Research Funding:

Stephen Weissman Kidney Cancer Research Fund.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • renal cell carcinoma
  • inflammatory markers
  • prognostic markers
  • De Ritis ratio
  • neutrophil lymphocyte ratio
  • survival
  • all-cause mortality
  • PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR
  • FOLLOW-UP
  • SURVIVAL

Association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and De Ritis ratio with mortality in renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter analysis

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY

Volume:

Volume 12

Publisher:

, Pages 995991-995991

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Several markers of inflammation have been associated with oncologic outcomes. Prognostic markers are not well-defined for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We sought to investigate the association of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and De Ritis ratio with mortality in RCC. Methods: Multi-center retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for RCC. Primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes were non-cancer mortality (NCM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Elevated NLR was defined as ≥2.27, elevated PLR as ≥165, and elevated De Ritis ratio as ≥ 2.72. Multivariable cox regression analysis (MVA) was conducted to elucidate risk factors for primary and secondary outcomes, and Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) was used to evaluate survival outcomes comparing elevated and non-elevated NLR, PLR, and De Ritis ratio. Results: 2656 patients were analyzed (874 patients had elevated NLR; 480 patients had elevated PLR and 932 patients had elevated De Ritis). Elevated NLR was a significant predictor of ACM (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64, p=0.003) and NCM (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.30-2.46, p<0.001) in MVA. Elevated De Ritis was a significant predictor of ACM (HR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.65-2.52), NCM (HR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.33-2.55, p<0.001), and CSM (HR 1.97, 95% CI:1.48-2.63, p<0.001). KMA revealed significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (48% vs. 68%, p<0.001), non-cancer survival (NCS) (69% vs. 87%, p<0.001), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (60% vs. 73%, p<0.001) for elevated versus non-elevated NLR. For PLR, there was a difference in 5-year OS (51% vs. 61%, p<0.001) and CSS (60% vs. 73%, p<0.001) with KMA. Conclusions: Elevated NLR was independently associated with worse ACM and NCM, while elevated De Ritis was predictive for CSM in addition to ACM and NCM. These differences may be useful in refining risk stratification with respect to cancer-related and non-cancer mortality in RCC patients and deserve further investigation.

Copyright information:

© 2022 Keiner, Meagher, Patil, Saito, Walia, Liu, Dutt, Miller, Dhanji, Saidian, Wan, Yasuda, Fujii, Tanaka, Master, Derweesh

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote