About this item:

53 Views | 21 Downloads

Author Notes:

Dr Adam Trickey, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Email: adam.trickey@bristol.ac.uk

JACS and AT conceived and designed the study. AT, LZ, and SMI combined, checked, cleaned, and verified the datasets. MJG, FB, GB, AC, MC, PC, HC, PD, SG, JG, NO, MP, MRa, PR, CTR, MRi, GS, MJS, CS, MS, TRS, and CAS (the individual cohort representatives) contributed to derivation, cleaning, and provision of cohort data, and confirmed the associations of antiretroviral therapy regimens within individual cohorts. AT did all statistical analyses. AT and JACS wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors interpretated the data and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. AT, LZ, and SMI accessed and verified the combined dataset. The individual cohort representatives could access the data from their own cohort.

We would like to thank our funders (US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and UK Medical Research Council) and all patients and the clinical teams associated with the participating cohort studies. The antiretroviral therapy cohort collaboration is funded by the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026209). UK Collaborative HIV Cohort is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (grant numbers G0000199, G0600337, G0900274, and M004236/1). JACS is funded by National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator award (NF-SI-0611-10168). AT is funded by the Wellcome Trust under a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (222770/Z/21/Z). Funding for the individual antiretroviral therapy cohort collaboration cohorts included in this analysis was from Alberta Health, Gilead, National Agency for AIDS Research (France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites), the French Ministry of Health, the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Stichting HIV Monitoring, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport through the Centre for Infectious Disease Control of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the TP-HIV by the German Centre for Infection Research (NCT02149004), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (through the Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Sida [RD06/006, RD12/0017/0018, and RD16/0002/0006]) as part of the Plan Nacional I + D + i. Other funders of the individual cohorts participating data for this analysis are ISCIII-Subdirección General de Evaluación and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, ViiV Healthcare, Preben og Anna Simonsens Fond, ANRS-Maladies infectieuses émergentes, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026230), the Spanish Ministry of Health, the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 33CS30_134277), Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (1R24 AI067039-1, P30-AI-027757), the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01-AA026224, U01-AA026209, U24-AA020794), the Veterans Health Administration Office of Research and Development, and the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Tennessee Center for AIDS Research P30 AI110527).

MC reports grants and payments for expert testimony from Gilead, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare, paid to their institution; and payment support for attending meetings from Gilead. PC reports advisory board and expert fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck; lecture fees from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead; and travel grants paid to their institution from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead. CS reports fees from Gilead for an educational presentation. MJG reports honoraria in the last 3 years from ad hoc membership of national HIV advisory boards, and from Merck, Gilead, and ViiV Healthcare. MP reports honoraria for presentations from Gilead and Merck; consulting fees from Gilead, Merck, and AbbVie; and a research grant from Gilead. FB reports travel grants and honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Janssen, and Merck; consulting fees and payment for expert testimony from Gilead; and support for attending meetings from Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare. PR reports independent scientific grant support from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare, paid to their institution; and has served on scientific advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck, for which honoraria were all paid to their institution, none related to the content of this Article. MRi reports funds from Gilead for attending meetings; and payment for lectures from ViiV Healthcare. MRa reports grants from Gilead. GB reports consulting fee from MedIQ; payments and honoraria from the University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, and StateServ; and funding from Merck, Eli Lily, Kaiser Permanente, and Amgen paid to their institution. HC reports research grant funding from ViiV Healthcare, National Institute of Health, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, paid to their institution; and sits on the National Institute of Health Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council. NO reports funding from the Preben og Anne Simonsens Fond. CAS reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Janssen–Cilag for membership of Data Safety and Monitoring Boards, Advisory Boards, and for preparation of educational materials; and is the vice-chair of the British HIV Association. PD reports consulting fees from Gilead, Merck, Janssen and Cilag, ViiV Healthcare, Roche, and Theratechnologies; and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gilead, Merck, Janssen, ViiV Healthcare, and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects:

Keywords:

  • Adult
  • Anti-HIV Agents
  • Cohort Studies
  • Darunavir
  • Europe
  • Female
  • HIV Infections
  • HIV Integrase Inhibitors
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • North America
  • Raltegravir Potassium
  • Rilpivirine

Associations of modern initial antiretroviral drug regimens with all-cause mortality in adults with HIV in Europe and North America: a cohort study

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

The Lancet HIV

Volume:

Volume 9, Number 6

Publisher:

, Pages e404-e413

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Over the past decade, antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens that include integrase strand inhibitors (INSTIs) have become the most commonly used for people with HIV starting ART. Although trials and observational studies have compared virological failure on INSTI-based with other regimens, few data are available on mortality in people with HIV treated with INSTIs in routine care. Therefore, we compared all-cause mortality between different INSTI-based and non-INSTI-based regimens in adults with HIV starting ART from 2013 to 2018. Methods: This cohort study used data on people with HIV in Europe and North America from the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) and UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC). We studied the most common third antiretroviral drugs (additional to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) used from 2013 to 2018: rilpivirine, darunavir, raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, efavirenz, and others. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; adjusted for clinical and demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and other drugs in the regimen) for mortality were estimated using Cox models stratified by ART start year and cohort, with multiple imputation of missing data. Findings: 62 500 ART-naive people with HIV starting ART (12 422 [19·9%] women; median age 38 [IQR 30–48]) were included in the study. 1243 (2·0%) died during 188 952 person-years of follow-up (median 3·0 years [IQR 1·6–4·4]). There was little evidence that mortality rates differed between regimens with dolutegravir, elvitegravir, rilpivirine, darunavir, or efavirenz as the third drug. However, mortality was higher for raltegravir compared with dolutegravir (aHR 1·49, 95% CI 1·15–1·94), elvitegravir (1·86, 1·43–2·42), rilpivirine (1·99, 1·49–2·66), darunavir (1·62, 1·33–1·98), and efavirenz (2·12, 1·60–2·81) regimens. Results were similar for analyses making different assumptions about missing data and consistent across the time periods 2013–15 and 2016–18. Rates of virological suppression were higher for dolutegravir than other third drugs. Interpretation: This large study of patients starting ART since the introduction of INSTIs found little evidence that mortality rates differed between most first-line ART regimens; however, raltegravir-based regimens were associated with higher mortality. Although unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded as an explanation for our findings, virological benefits of first-line INSTIs-based ART might not translate to differences in mortality. Funding: US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and UK Medical Research Council.

Copyright information:

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote