About this item:

81 Views | 24 Downloads

Author Notes:

Bree R. Eaton, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, A1300, Atlanta, GA 303022. Email: brupper@emory.edu

Bree R. Eaton: Concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, review of the literature, and critical revision of the manuscript. Grace W. Fong: Concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, review of the literature, and critical revision of the manuscript. Lisa M. Ingerski: Drafting of the manuscript, review of the literature, and critical revision of the manuscript. Margaret B. Pulsifer: Concept and design and critical revision of the manuscript. Subir Goyal: Concept and design and critical revision of the manuscript. Chao Zhang: Concept and design and critical revision of the manuscript. Elizabeth A. Weyman: Critical revision of the manuscript. Natia Esiashvili: Critical revision of the manuscript. James L. Klosky: Critical revision of the manuscript. Tobey J. MacDonald: Critical revision of the manuscript. David H. Ebb: Critical revision of the manuscript. Shannon M. MacDonald: Critical revision of the manuscript. Nancy J. Tarbell: Critical revision of the manuscript. Torunn I. Yock: Concept and design, drafting of the manuscript, review of the literature, and critical revision of the manuscript.

Torunn I. Yock has received research funding from Protom, IBA, Elekta, and Mim (in kind funding, not monetary). The other authors made no disclosures.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

The research reported in this publication was funded in part by the National Cancer Institute under award P01CA021239 and by the federal share program income earned by Massachusetts General Hospital on C06 CA059267 (Proton Therapy Research and Treatment Center).

This research was also supported in part by the Biostatistics Shared Resource of the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award P30CA138292. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Oncology
  • intelligence
  • medulloblastoma
  • neurocognitive
  • pediatric
  • photon
  • proton
  • radiation
  • BRAIN-TUMORS
  • THERAPY
  • SURVIVORS
  • OUTCOMES
  • CHEMOTHERAPY
  • VALIDITY

Intellectual functioning among case-matched cohorts of children treated with proton or photon radiation for standard-risk medulloblastoma

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

CANCER

Volume:

Volume 127, Number 20

Publisher:

, Pages 3840-3846

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy may reduce cognitive deficits after radiotherapy among brain tumor survivors, although current data are limited to retrospective comparisons between historical cohorts. The authors compared intelligence quotient scores within a case-matched cohort of children with medulloblastoma treated with proton radiation (PRT) or photon radiation (XRT) over the same time period. METHODS: Among 88 consecutive patients with standard-risk medulloblastoma treated with PRT or XRT at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2009, 50 were matched 1:1 (25 with PRT and 25 with XRT) according to age, gender, date of diagnosis, histology, radiation boost, and craniospinal irradiation dose. One-way analyses of variance were performed to compare the Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ) and associated index scores between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: Neurocognitive data were available for 37 survivors (17 with PRT and 20 with XRT) from the matched cohort. The mean age was 8.5 years (SD, 4.14 years). The median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 1.0-11.4 years) and 4.6 years (range, 1.1-11.2 years) for the PRT and XRT cohorts, respectively (P =.193). Patients treated with PRT had significantly higher mean FSIQ (99.6 vs 86.2; P =.021), verbal (105.2 vs 88.6; P =.010), and nonverbal scores (103.1 vs 88.9; P =.011) than the XRT-treated cohort. Differences in processing speed (82.9 vs 77.2; P =.331) and working memory (97.0 vs 92.7; P =.388) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy-associated cognitive effects appear to be more attenuated after proton therapy. Comprehensive prospective studies are needed to appropriately evaluate the neurocognitive advantages of proton therapy.
Export to EndNote