About this item:

118 Views | 42 Downloads

Author Notes:

Mala Shanmugam, mala.shan@emory.edu

Conceptualization: A.S. and M.S. Methodology: A.S., R.N., K.B., P.G., C.L.E., and O.A. Serial sample identification: A.P.W. Metabolomics, tracing studies, RNA-seq, CoMMpass, and sc-RNA-seq bioinformatic analyses: A.A. and A.M. RNA-seq analyses: B.D. RNA-seq analyses oversight: M.B. Patient sample purification: S.M.M. and V.A.G. NOXA gene editing: S.M.M. Myeloma patient sample collection oversight: A.K.N. and S.L. Supervision: D.N. and M.S. Writing (original draft): A.S. and M.S. Writing (review and editing): A.S., M.S., L.H.B., V.A.G., B.G.B., and A.P.W.

We would like to thank Y.-H. T. Lin for the 50 paired-relapse specimen analysis, A. Hammond, Emory University for editorial assistance, and the Pediatric/Winship Flow Cytometry Core.

A.K.N. received grant/research support from Takeda, Amgen, Janssen, BMS, GSK, Karyopharm, Pfizer, Merck, KITE, Genentech, and Arch Oncology; received grant/research support (for investigator-initiated studies) from Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Merck, and Janssen; and served on advisory boards and received honorarium from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, Sanofi, Adaptive, GlaxoSmithKline, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, SecuraBio, and Beyond Springs. S.L. receives research support from Takeda, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, and Janssen for trials conducted at Emory and a consultant for Takeda, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Amgen, Janssen, GSK, and AbbVie. L.H.B. receives research funding from AstraZeneca (2019), consultancy and honoraria from AstraZeneca, and performs consultancy for Genentech (2019) and AbbVie. M.B. is an advisor for Sanofi-Genzyme. A.P.W. is a member of the scientific advisory board and holds equity stakes in Indapta Therapeutics and Protocol Intelligence LLC. Emory University has submitted a U.S. Patent Application No. 17/348,487 on 15 June 2021. Inventors on the application entitled “Uses of electron transport chain complex I or complex II inhibitors in treating cancer, combination therapies, and diagnostic methods related thereto” are A.S. and M.S. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute, NIH grant R01 CA208328, National Cancer Institute, NIH grant R01 CA247367, and Leukemia Lymphoma Society TRP Award #6573-19.

The Winship Invest$ Award Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource of Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and NIH/NCI under award number P30CA138292.

Keywords:

  • Antiporters
  • Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cystine
  • Glutamates
  • Humans
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Proteasome Inhibitors
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2
  • Sulfonamides

Therapeutic implications of mitochondrial stress–induced proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Science Advances

Volume:

Volume 8, Number 39

Publisher:

, Pages eabq5575-eabq5575

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

The connections between metabolic state and therapy resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) are poorly understood. We previously reported that electron transport chain (ETC) suppression promotes sensitivity to the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax. Here, we show that ETC suppression promotes resistance to proteasome inhibitors (PIs). Interrogation of ETC-suppressed MM reveals integrated stress response–dependent suppression of protein translation and ubiquitination, leading to PI resistance. ETC and protein translation gene expression signatures from the CoMMpass trial are down-regulated in patients with poor outcome and relapse, corroborating our in vitro findings. ETC-suppressed MM exhibits up-regulation of the cystine-glutamate antiporter SLC7A11, and analysis of patient single-cell RNA-seq shows that clusters with low ETC gene expression correlate with higher SLC7A11 expression. Furthermore, erastin or venetoclax treatment diminishes mitochondrial stress–induced PI resistance. In sum, our work demonstrates that mitochondrial stress promotes PI resistance and underscores the need for implementing combinatorial regimens in MM cognizant of mitochondrial metabolic state.

Copyright information:

© 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Export to EndNote