About this item:

78 Views | 35 Downloads

Author Notes:

Joseph L. Jacobson, Ph.D., Distinguished Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, Telephone (313) 993-5454. Email: joseph.jacobson@wayne.edu

We appreciate the pioneering work of Ann P. Streissguth, Ph.D., who initiated and directed the first prospective, longitudinal cohort study on the neurobehavioral sequelae of PAE and inspired us and many others in the field. We are grateful to the individuals and families who participated in the six cohort studies without whom this unique and valuable research would not have been possible and for the contributions of our dedicated collaborators and research staff.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research was supported by Grant No. R01 AA025905 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Lycaki-Young Fund from the State of Michigan. Louise Ryan received support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers (Grant No. CE140100049). Richard J. Cook was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grants RGPIN 155849 and RGPIN 04207.

. Data collection for the Detroit cohort was supported by NIAAA/NIH grants R01 AA06966, R01 AA09524, and P50 AA07606 and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)/NIH grant R21 DA021034; for the Pittsburgh cohorts, by NIAAA/NIH grants R01 AA06390, R01 AA06666, R01 AA14215, R01 AA18116, National Institute on Child Health and Human Development/NIH grant HD036890, and NIDA/NIH grants R01 DA00090, R01 DA03209, R01 DA03874, and R01 DA17786, R01 DA05460, R01 DA06839, R01-DA08916, and R01 DA12401; for the Atlanta cohorts, by NIAAA/NIH grants R01 AA08105, R01 AA10108, and R01 AA13272, NIDA/NIH grants R01 DA0737362 and R01 DA0737362, and Georgia State Contract DHR 427 93 05050762; and for the Seattle cohort, by NIAAA/NIH grant R01 AA01455.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Substance Abuse
  • behavior problems
  • causal analysis
  • cognitive development
  • fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
  • IQ
  • meta-analysis
  • multiple outcomes
  • prenatal alcohol exposure
  • CITY CHILD CHARACTERISTICS
  • MATERNAL RISK TRAITS
  • SPECTRUM DISORDERS
  • ATTENTION-DEFICIT
  • ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT
  • MEMORY IMPAIRMENT
  • WORKING-MEMORY
  • SCHOOL-AGE
  • DRUG-USE
  • ADOLESCENTS

Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on cognitive and behavioral development: Findings from a hierarchical meta-analysis of data from six prospective longitudinal US cohorts

Tools:

Journal Title:

ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH

Volume:

Volume 45, Number 10

Publisher:

, Pages 2040-2058

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background: Cognitive and behavioral sequelae of prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) continue to be prevalent in the United States and worldwide. Because these sequelae are also common in other neurodevelopmental disorders, researchers have attempted to identify a distinct neurobehavioral profile to facilitate the differential diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). We used an innovative, individual participant meta-analytic technique to combine data from six large U.S. longitudinal cohorts to provide a more comprehensive and reliable characterization of the neurobehavioral deficits seen in FASD than can be obtained from smaller samples. Methods: Meta-analyses were performed on data from 2236 participants to examine effects of PAE (measured as oz absolute alcohol/day (AA/day)) on IQ, four domains of cognition function (learning and memory, executive function, reading achievement, and math achievement), sustained attention, and behavior problems, after adjusting for potential confounders using propensity scores. Results: The effect sizes for IQ and the four domains of cognitive function were strikingly similar to one another and did not differ at school age, adolescence, or young adulthood. Effect sizes were smaller in the more middle-class Seattle cohort and larger in the three cohorts that obtained more detailed and comprehensive assessments of AA/day. PAE effect sizes were somewhat weaker for parent- and teacher-reported behavior problems and not significant for sustained attention. In a meta-analysis of five aspects of executive function, the strongest effect was on set-shifting. Conclusions: The similarity in the effect sizes for the four domains of cognitive function suggests that PAE affects an underlying component or components of cognition involving learning and memory and executive function that are reflected in IQ and academic achievement scores. The weaker effects in the more middle-class cohort may reflect a more cognitively stimulating environment, a different maternal drinking pattern (lower alcohol dose/occasion), and/or better maternal prenatal nutrition. These findings identify two domains of cognition—learning/memory and set-shifting—that are particularly affected by PAE, and one, sustained attention, which is apparently spared.
Export to EndNote