Setting the Terms for Zoonotic Diseases: Effective Communication for Research, Conservation, and Public Policy

• Authors: Julie Teresa Shapiro, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Luis Viquez-R, University of Ulm; Stefania Leopardi, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie; Amanda Vicente-Santos, Emory University; Ian H Mendenhall, Duke-NUS Medical School; Winifred F Frick, Bat Conservation International, Austin; Rebekah C Kading, Colorado State University; Rodrigo A Medellin, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM); Paul Racey, University of Exeter; Tigga Kingston, Texas Tech University
• Journal Title: Viruses-Basel
• Volume: Volume 13, Number 7
• Publisher: MDPI AG | 2021-07-13
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/v13071356
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
• Keywords: bats; Chiroptera; conservation; emerging infectious diseases; public health; science communication; zoonoses

Abstract

Many of the world’s most pressing issues, such as the emergence of zoonotic diseases, can only be addressed through interdisciplinary research. However, the findings of interdisciplinary research are susceptible to miscommunication among both professional and non-professional audiences due to differences in training, language, experience, and understanding. Such miscommunication contributes to the misunderstanding of key concepts or processes and hinders the development of effective research agendas and public policy. These misunderstandings can also provoke unnecessary fear in the public and have devastating effects for wildlife conservation. For example, inaccurate communication and subsequent misunderstanding of the potential associations between certain bats and zoonoses has led to persecution of diverse bats worldwide and even government calls to cull them. Here, we identify four types of miscommunication driven by the use of terminology regarding bats and the emergence of zoonotic diseases that we have categorized based on their root causes: (1) incorrect or overly broad use of terms; (2) terms that have unstable usage within a discipline, or different usages among disciplines; (3) terms that are used correctly but spark incorrect inferences about biological processes or significance in the audience; (4) incorrect inference drawn from the evidence presented. We illustrate each type of miscommunication with commonly misused or misinterpreted terms, providing a definition, caveats and common misconceptions, and suggest alternatives as appropriate. While we focus on terms specific to bats and disease ecology, we present a more general framework for addressing miscommunication that can be applied to other topics and disciplines to facilitate more effective research, problem-solving, and public policy.