About this item:

75 Views | 28 Downloads

Author Notes:

Barbara Church, Language Research Center, Georgia State University, 3401 Panthersville Rd, Decatur, GA 30034. Email: bchurch@gsu.edu

All experiments were approved by the IRB or IACUC at Georgia State University, and all human participants provided written informed consent.

The authors have no conflicts of interest. None of the experiments were pre-registered.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, BCS-1552405 and the National Institute of Child Health and Development, R01HD-093690. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Keywords:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology, Experimental
  • Psychology
  • self-awareness
  • agency
  • comparative cognition
  • categorization
  • discrimination learning
  • RHESUS-MONKEYS
  • UNCERTAINTY RESPONSES
  • AWARENESS
  • METACOGNITION
  • ABNORMALITIES
  • INFORMATION
  • MOVEMENTS
  • IMPLICIT
  • MEMORY
  • ALIEN

Launch! Self-Agency as a Discriminative Cue for Humans (Homo Sapiens) and Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta)

Tools:

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL

Volume:

Volume 150, Number 9

Publisher:

, Pages 1901-1917

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Self-agency is a crucial aspect of self-awareness. It is underresearched given the phenomenon’s subjectivity and difficulty of study. It is particularly underresearched comparatively, given that animals cannot receive agency instructions or make agency declarations. Accordingly, we developed a distinctively new self-agency paradigm. Humans and rhesus macaques learned event categories differentiated by whether the participant’s volitional response controlled a screen launch. They learned by trial and error after minimal instructions with no agency orientation (humans) or no instructions (monkeys). After learning, humans’ verbalized category descriptions were coded for self-agency attributions. Across three experiments, humans’ agency attributions qualitatively improved discrimination performance—participants not invoking self-agency rarely exceeded chance performance. It also produced a diagnostic latency profile: classification accuracy depended heavily on the temporal relationship between the button-press and the launch, but only for those invoking agency. In our last experiment, monkeys performed the launch task. Their performance and latency profiles mirrored that of humans. Thus, self-agency can be self-discovered as a frame organizing discrimination. And it may be used as a discrimination cue by some nonhuman animals as well.
Export to EndNote