About this item:

42 Views | 10 Downloads

Author Notes:

Mary Rooney, 2024 E. Monument St. Suite 2-600, Baltimore, MD, 21287. Email

The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract nos. (HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700005I, HHSN268201700004I).

This work was also supported by a grant from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [T32HL007779 (MRR)] and the American Heart Association [16EIA26410001 (AA)].

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • proton pump inhibitors
  • circulating magnesium
  • cardiovascular disease
  • prospective
  • ELECTROLYTE DISTURBANCES
  • ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
  • GENERAL-POPULATION
  • SERUM MAGNESIUM
  • ISCHEMIC-STROKE
  • METAANALYSIS
  • DESIGN
  • ADULTS

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use, Hypomagnesemia and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Tools:

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY

Volume:

Volume 55, Number 8

Publisher:

, Pages 677-683

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Goals: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is cross-sectionally associated with hypomagnesemia and whether hypomagnesemia mediates the prospective association between PPIs and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Background: Use of PPIs has been associated with hypomagnesemia, primarily in case reports or within insurance databases. Both PPI use and low serum magnesium (Mg) have been associated with modestly higher CVD risk. Yet, the interrelation between PPI use and Mg in relation to CVD risk is unclear. Study: The 4436 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities participants without prevalent CVD at visit 5 (baseline, 2011-2013) were included. Multivariable relative risk regression was used for cross-sectional analyses between PPI and hypomagnesemia prevalence (≤0.75 mmol/L). Incident CVD (defined by atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, CVD mortality, heart failure, stroke) was identified through 2017. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the PPI-CVD association. Results: Participants were mean±SD aged 75±5 years; 63% were women, 23% Black, and 24% were PPI users. PPI users had 1.24-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.44) higher prevalence of hypomagnesemia than nonusers. Over a median 5 years of follow-up, 684 incident CVD events occurred. PPI users had higher CVD risk [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.31 (1.10-1.57)] than nonusers. The effect estimate was largely unchanged when hypomagnesemia was added to the model as a potential mediator. Conclusions: In this elderly community-based study, PPI users had a higher prevalence of hypomagnesemia than in nonusers. PPI users also had higher CVD risk than nonusers; however, it appears unlikely that hypomagnesemia explains associations of PPIs with CVD risk.

Copyright information:

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Export to EndNote