About this item:

97 Views | 57 Downloads

Author Notes:

haydn.kissick@emory.edu; mehmet.a.bilen@emory.edu; vmaster@emory.edu

JWC and CJ are co-first authors. VAM, MAB, and HK are co-last authors.

Conception and design: JWC, CJ, MAB, HK. Acquisition of data: JWC, CJ, MAC, AMR, RG, LDB, NP, DB, FH, RL. Analysis and interpretation of data: JWC, CJ, MAC, ES, AMR, RG, NP, PCM, AO. Technical resources and expertise: SW, RL, AS. Clinical samples: OK, BCC, PCM, AO, VAM, MAB. Statistical analysis: YL, HK. Manuscript drafting: JWC, CJ, MAC, HK. Manuscript revision: JWC, CJ, MAC, HK. Guarantor: HK. Final approval: all authors.

MAB has acted as a paid consultant for and/or as a member of the advisory boards of Exelixis, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Calithera Biosciences, Genomic Health, Nektar, and Sanofi and has received grants to his institution from Xencor, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Nektar, AstraZeneca, Tricon Pharmaceuticals, Genome & Company, AAA, Peloton Therapeutics, and Pfizer for work performed as outside of the current study. HK acted as a paid consultant for Nektar and received grants to his institution from Nektar.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

CJ is supported by a National Cancer Institute grant (1-F30-CA-243250).

Keywords:

  • Biomarkers
  • Tumor
  • CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
  • Immunotherapy
  • Kidney Neoplasms
  • Lymphocytes
  • Tumor-Infiltrating

Clinical outcome following checkpoint therapy in renal cell carcinoma is associated with a burst of activated CD8 T cells in blood

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Volume:

Volume 10, Number 7

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Purpose Checkpoint therapy is now the cornerstone of treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with advanced disease, but biomarkers are lacking to predict which patients will benefit. This study proposes potential immunological biomarkers that could developed for predicting therapeutic response in patients with RCC. Methods Using flow cytometry, RNA sequencing, and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing, we investigated changes in T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced RCC after receiving immunotherapy. We used immunofluorescence (IF) imaging and flow cytometry to investigate how intratumoral T cells in patients’ tumors (resected months/years prior to receiving checkpoint therapy) predicted patient outcomes after immunotherapy. Results We found that a small proportion of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the blood activate following checkpoint therapy, expressing the proliferation marker Ki67 and activation markers HLA-DR and CD38. Patients who had the highest increase in these HLA-DR +CD38+CD8 T cells after treatment had the best antitumor immune response and experienced clinical benefit. Using RNA sequencing, we found that while these cells expanded in most patients, their phenotype did not drastically change during treatment. However, when we analyzed the TCR repertoire of these HLA-DR +CD38+CD8+T cells, we found that only patients who clinically benefitted had a burst of new clonotypes enter this pool of activated cells. Finally, we found that abundant T cells in the untreated tumors predicted clinical benefit to checkpoint therapy on disease progression. Conclusions Together, these data suggest that having a strong pre-existing immune response and immediate peripheral T-cell activation after checkpoint therapy is a predictor of clinical benefit in patients with RCC.

Copyright information:

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote