About this item:

120 Views | 72 Downloads

Author Notes:

Anna Woodbury, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University SOM, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Tel: 404-778-5582; Fax: 404-686-4475; E-mail: anna.woodbury@va.gov

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions and conversations from members of the Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Imaging and the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, including Dr. Lisa Krishnamurthy, Dr. Keith McGregor, Dr. Lawrence Phillips, Lawson Meadows, Mary Allen, and Matt Lejeune. The authors would also like to acknowledge the neuroimaging support of Dr. Kate Revill and Dr. Jason Allen.

Conflicts of interest and disclosure: Vitaly Napadow has a financial interest in Cala Health, which was reviewed and is being managed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their institutional policies. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to report.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research was supported in part by Career Development Awards 1IK1RX002113-01A2, 1IK2RX003227-01 (Anna Woodbury), and 1IK2RX002934 (Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy); by Senior Research Career Scientist Award Grant B6364L (Bruce Crosson) and Center Grant 5I50RX002358 from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service; and by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. R01MH105561 and R01MH118771 (Ying Guo).

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Anesthesiology
  • Medicine, General & Internal
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS)
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Alternative Therapies
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Chronic Pain
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • INTRINSIC BRAIN CONNECTIVITY
  • NERVE-STIMULATION
  • PAIN
  • SENSITIVITY
  • NETWORK
  • PREGABALIN
  • HEALTH
  • MATTER
  • COST
  • US

Feasibility of Auricular Field Stimulation in Fibromyalgia: Evaluation by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Randomized Trial

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

PAIN MEDICINE

Volume:

Volume 22, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 715-726

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, preliminary efficacy, and acceptability of auricular percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia in veterans, using neuroimaging as an outcome measure and a biomarker of treatment response. Design: Randomized, controlled, single-blind. Setting: Government hospital. Subjects: Twenty-one veterans with fibromyalgia were randomized to standard therapy (ST) control or ST with auricular PENFS treatment. Methods: Participants received weekly visits with a pain practitioner over 4 weeks. The PENFS group received reapplication of PENFS at each weekly visit. Resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) data were collected within 2 weeks prior to initiating treatment and 2 weeks following the final treatment. Analysis of rs-fcMRI used a right posterior insula seed. Pain and function were assessed at baseline and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks post-treatment. Results: At 12 weeks post-treatment, there was a nonsignificant trend toward improved pain scores and significant improvements in pain interference with sleep among the PENFS treatment group as compared with the ST controls. Neuroimaging data displayed increased connectivity to areas of the cerebellum and executive control networks in the PENFS group as compared with the ST control group following treatment. Conclusions: There was a trend toward improved pain and function among veterans with fibromyalgia in the ST + PENFS group as compared with the ST control group. Pain and functional outcomes correlated with altered rs-fcMRI network connectivity. Neuroimaging results differed between groups, suggesting an alternative underlying mechanism for PENFS analgesia.

Copyright information:

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine 2020.

Export to EndNote