About this item:

84 Views | 44 Downloads

Author Notes:

R. J. Fredericksen, Email: rfrederi@uw.edu

RF, HC, JD, RN, BW, and ET generated the concept of interest and the approach to analysis. Data was curated by BW, JD, SK, RN, ET, WE, CC, DS, and JR. The formal analysis was performed by BW, RN, and ET, with oversight by JD and HC. BW performed STTR project coordination and management. RF, BW, and EF authored the original draft. In subsequent drafts. RF led authorship on all subsequent and final drafts. Editing and review of subsequent drafts was performed by RF, BW, RN, HC, JD, EF, FA, AC, CC, CD, AD, WE, SK, IK, KM, SM, LO, VQ, JR, DS, SS, FT, and WW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors would like to thank the research teams associated with the Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain Data Collection and Harmonization Initiative whose collaboration has made this project possible and particularly the participants in the individual STTR studies for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating STTR investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.sttr-hiv.org. Research presented in this paper is the result of secondary data analyses associated with the STTR Data Collection and Harmonization Initiative and was supported by U01DA037702 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). For this manuscript, we harmonized data from the following grants: BCAP1 R01DA032083, BRIGHT1 R01DA030771, STAR R01DA032100, and STTS R01DA030796. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

S. Springer received consultation payment from Alkermes Inc. for scientific expertise consulting. No other disclosures.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by U01DA037702 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). For this manuscript, we harmonized data from the following grants: BCAP1 R01DA032083, BRIGHT1 R01DA030771, STAR R01DA032100, and STTS R01DA030796. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
  • Substance use
  • Condom use
  • ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT
  • EVENT-LEVEL ASSOCIATIONS
  • RISK BEHAVIOR
  • ANAL INTERCOURSE
  • MARIJUANA USE
  • ALCOHOL-USE
  • IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS
  • TRANSGENDER WOMEN
  • BISEXUAL MEN
  • POSITIVE MEN

Individual and poly-substance use and condomless sex among HIV-uninfected adults reporting heterosexual sex in a multi-site cohort

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

Volume:

Volume 21, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 2002-2002

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: We analyzed the association between substance use (SU) and condomless sex (CS) among HIV-negative adults reporting heterosexual sex in the Seek, Test, Treat, and Retain (STTR) consortium. We describe the impact of SU as well as person/partner and context-related factors on CS, identifying combinations of factors that indicate the highest likelihood of CS. Methods: We analyzed data from four US-based STTR studies to examine the effect of SU on CS using two SU exposures: 1) recent SU (within 3 months) and 2) SU before/during sex. Behavioral data were collected via 1:1 or self-administered computerized interviews. Adjusted individual-study, multivariable relative risk regression was used to examine the relationship between CS and SU. We also examined interactions with type of sex and partner HIV status. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using traditional fixed-effects meta-analysis. We analyzed data for recent SU (n = 6781; 82% men, median age = 33 years) and SU before/during sex (n = 2915; 69% men, median age = 40 years). Results: For both exposure classifications, any SU other than cannabis increased the likelihood of CS relative to non-SU (8–16%, p-values< 0.001). In the recent SU group, however, polysubstance use did not increase the likelihood of CS compared to single-substance use. Cannabis use did not increase the likelihood of CS, regardless of frequency of use. Type of sex was associated with CS; those reporting vaginal and anal sex had a higher likelihood of CS compared to vaginal sex only for both exposure classifications (18–21%, p < 0.001). Recent SU increased likelihood of CS among those reporting vaginal sex only (9–10%, p < 0.001); results were similar for those reporting vaginal and anal sex (5–8%, p < 0.01). SU before/during sex increased the likelihood of CS among those reporting vaginal sex only (20%; p < 0.001) and among those reporting vaginal and anal sex (7%; p = 0.002). Single- and poly-SU before/during sex increased the likelihood of CS for those with exclusively HIV-negative partners (7–8%, p ≤ 0.02), and for those reporting HIV-negative and HIV-status unknown partners (9–13%, p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: Except for cannabis, any SU increased the likelihood of CS. CS was associated with having perceived HIV-negative partners and with having had both anal/vaginal sex.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2021

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote