About this item:

76 Views | 44 Downloads

Author Notes:

Hyeong-Moo Shin, Ph.D., University of Texas, Arlington, 500 Yates Street, Box 19049, Arlington, TX, 76019. Email: hyeongmoo.shin@uta.edu. Voice: 949-648-1614

Kyunghoon Kim: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Hyeong-Moo Shin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Stefanie A. Busgang: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Dana Boyd Barr: Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Parinya Panuwet: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Rebecca J. Schmidt: Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Irva Hertz-Picciotto: Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing, Methodology. Deborah Bennett: Writing - review & editing, Methodology, Funding acquisition.

We would like to thank the MARBLES study participants for making this research possible. We would also like to acknowledge Grace Lee and Priya D’Souza for their contribution to laboratory analyses at Emory University’s LEADER. We also acknowledge Dr. Kelly K. Ferguson at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and Dr. John D. Meeker at the University of Michigan School of Public Health who kindly provided annual GM biomarker concentrations measured in LIFECODES and PROTECT studies, respectively.

Lab and epidemiological data for the MARBLES cohort are hosted at the CHEAR Data Center Repository (https://cheardatacenter.mssm.edu/) under the following DOIs: 10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-UEP_Trim1, 10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-UEP_Trim2_3, 10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-Covars, 10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-Demo, 10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-Outcome,10.36043/CHEAR-2016-1449-Spec.

The authors declare that they have no actual or potential competing financial interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R21-ES025551, R21-ES028131, R01-ES020392, R24-ES028533, P30-ES023513, P01-ES011269, U2C-ES026555, U2C-ES026560, P30-ES019776, U54-HD079125, UH3-OD023342), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (83543201), and the UC Davis MIND Institute.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Engineering, Environmental
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences & Ecology
  • bisphenols
  • geographic variations
  • personal care products
  • regulations
  • social forces
  • temporal changes
  • BISPHENOL-A CONCENTRATIONS
  • NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY
  • URINARY CONCENTRATIONS
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOLS
  • PRENATAL EXPOSURE
  • REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
  • NATIONAL-HEALTH
  • FETAL EXPOSURE
  • VARIABILITY
  • PREDICTORS

Temporal Trends of Phenol, Paraben, and Triclocarban Exposure in California Pregnant Women during 2007-2014

Tools:

Journal Title:

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Volume:

Volume 55, Number 16

Publisher:

, Pages 11155-11165

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Little is known about temporal trends of pregnant women's exposures to environmental phenols and parabens. We quantified four phenols [bisphenol A (BPA), bisphenol F, bisphenol S, and triclosan), four parabens [butyl paraben, ethyl paraben (ETPB), methyl paraben (MEPB), and propyl paraben (PRPB)], and triclocarban in 760 urine samples collected during 2007-2014 from 218 California pregnant women participating in a high-familial risk autism spectrum disorder cohort. We applied multiple regression to compute least square geometric means of urinary concentrations and computed average annual percent changes. We compared our urinary concentrations with those of other study populations to examine geographic variations in pregnant women's exposure to these target compounds. Urinary concentrations of BPA, MEPB, ETPB, and PRPB in this study population decreased over the study period [percent change per year (95% confidence interval): -5.7% (-8.2%, -3.2%); -13.0% (-18.1%, -7.7%); -5.5% (-11.0%, 0.3%); and -13.3% (-18.3%, -8.1%), respectively] and were consistently lower than those in pregnant women in other U.S. regions during the same study period. In recent years, certain phenols and parabens with known adverse health effects are being regulated or replaced with alternatives, which explains decreased body burdens observed in this study population. Either the national regulations or the advocacy campaigns in California may have influenced exposures or consumer product choices.
Export to EndNote