Investigating the correlation of muscle function tests and sarcomere organization in C. elegans

• Authors: Leila Lesanpezeshki, Texas Tech University; Hiroshi Qadota, Emory University; Masoud Norouzi Darabad, Texas Tech University; Karishma Kashyap, Texas Tech University; Carla MR Lacerda, Texas Tech University; Nathaniel J Szewczyk, University of Nottingham; Guy Benian, Emory University; Siva A Vanapalli, Texas Tech University
• Journal Title: SKELETAL MUSCLE
• Volume: Volume 11, Number 1
• Publisher: BMC | 2021-08-13, Pages 20-20
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-021-00275-4
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Pathology; Engineering, Chemical
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Cell Biology; Muscle physiology; Burrowing assay; Microfluidics; Muscle genetics; Sarcomere structure; CAENORHABDITIS-ELEGANS; FILAMENT ORGANIZATION; ATTACHMENT STRUCTURES; FINGER PROTEIN; ENCODES; ACTIN; IDENTIFICATION; LOCALIZATION; LOCOMOTION; DYSTROPHIN

Abstract

Background: Caenorhabditis elegans has been widely used as a model to study muscle structure and function. Its body wall muscle is functionally and structurally similar to vertebrate skeletal muscle with conserved molecular pathways contributing to sarcomere structure, and muscle function. However, a systematic investigation of the relationship between muscle force and sarcomere organization is lacking. Here, we investigate the contribution of various sarcomere proteins and membrane attachment components to muscle structure and function to introduce C. elegans as a model organism to study the genetic basis of muscle strength. Methods: We employ two recently developed assays that involve exertion of muscle forces to investigate the correlation of muscle function to sarcomere organization. We utilized a microfluidic pillar-based platform called NemaFlex that quantifies the maximum exertable force and a burrowing assay that challenges the animals to move in three dimensions under a chemical stimulus. We selected 20 mutants with known defects in various substructures of sarcomeres and compared the physiological function of muscle proteins required for force generation and transmission. We also characterized the degree of sarcomere disorganization using immunostaining approaches. Results: We find that mutants with genetic defects in thin filaments, thick filaments, and M-lines are generally weaker, and our assays are successful in detecting the functional changes in response to each sarcomere location tested. We find that the NemaFlex and burrowing assays are functionally distinct informing on different aspects of muscle physiology. Specifically, the burrowing assay has a larger bandwidth in phenotyping muscle mutants, because it could pick ten additional mutants impaired while exerting normal muscle force in NemaFlex. This enabled us to combine their readouts to develop an integrated muscle function score that was found to correlate with the score for muscle structure disorganization. Conclusions: Our results highlight the suitability of NemaFlex and burrowing assays for evaluating muscle physiology of C. elegans. Using these approaches, we discuss the importance of the studied sarcomere proteins for muscle function and structure. The scoring methodology we have developed enhances the utility of C. elegans as a genetic model to study muscle function.