About this item:

79 Views | 30 Downloads

Author Notes:

Jordan M. Cloyd, jordan.cloyd@osumc.edu

Conceptualization, all authors; data curation, all authors; methodology, E.W.B., L.P.S.-K. and J.M.C.; formal analysis, E.W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.W.B. and L.P.S.-K.; writing—review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Subject:

Research Funding:

This research received no external funding.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Medicine, General & Internal
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • cytoreductive surgery
  • hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
  • colorectal peritoneal metastases
  • SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY
  • CARCINOMATOSIS
  • CANCER
  • SURVIVAL
  • TRIALS
  • HIPEC
  • CHEMOPERFUSION
  • COMPLICATIONS
  • BEVACIZUMAB

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE

Volume:

Volume 9, Number 3

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with improved survival for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CR-PM). However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to CRS-HIPEC is poorly understood. A retrospective review of adult patients with CR-PM who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC from 2000–2017 was performed. Among 298 patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC, 196 (65.8%) received NAC while 102 (34.2%) underwent surgery first (SF). Patients who received NAC had lower peritoneal cancer index score (12.1 + 7.9 vs. 14.3 + 8.5, p = 0.034). There was no significant difference in grade III/IV complications (22.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.650), readmission (32.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.114), or 30-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.411) between groups. NAC patients experienced longer overall survival (OS) (median 32.7 vs. 22.0 months, p = 0.044) but similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 13.8 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.456). After controlling for confounding factors, NAC was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.80) or RFS (OR 1.04). Among patients who underwent CRS+/-HIPEC for CR-PM, the use of NAC was associated with improved OS that did not persist on multivariable analysis. However, NAC prior to CRS+/-HIPEC was a safe and feasible strategy for CR-PM, which may aid in the appropriate selection of patients for aggressive cytoreductive surgery.

Copyright information:

© 2020 by the authors.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote