Need for Better and Broader Training in Cardio-Obstetrics: A National Survey of Cardiologists, Cardiovascular Team Members, and Cardiology Fellows in Training

• Authors: Natalie A Bello, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center; Akanksha Agrawal, Emory University; Melinda B Davis, University of Michigan; Colleen M Harrington, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Kathryn J Lindley, Washington University in St Louis; Margo B Minissian, Cedars‐Sinai Smidt Heart Institute and the Geri and Richard Brawerman Nursing Institute; Garima Sharma, Johns Hopkins University; Mary Norine Walsh, St. Vincent Heart Center; Ki Park, University of Florida
• Journal Title: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
• Volume: Volume 11, Number 8
• Publisher: WILEY | 2022-04-19, Pages e024229-e024229
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.024229
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery
• Keywords: Science & Technology; Life Sciences & Biomedicine; Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems; Cardiovascular System & Cardiology; cardio-obstetrics; continuing medical education; medical knowledge; pregnancy; UNITED-STATES; WOMEN; PREGNANCY; HYPERTENSION; STRATEGIES; DISEASE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Team-based models of cardio-obstetrics care have been developed to address the increasing rate of maternal mortality from cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular clinician and trainee knowledge and comfort with this topic, and the extent of implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to cardio-obstetrics, are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We aimed to assess the current state of cardio-obstetrics knowledge, practices, and services provided by US cardiovascular clinicians and trainees. A survey developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology was circulated to a representative sample of cardiologists (N=311), cardiovascular team members (N=51), and fellows in training (N=139) from June 18, 2020, to July 29, 2020. Knowledge and attitudes about the provision of cardiovascular care to pregnant patients and the prevalence and composition of cardio-obstetrics teams were assessed. The widest knowledge gaps on the care of pregnant compared with nonpregnant patients were reported for medication safety (42%), acute coronary syndromes (39%), aortopathies (40%), and valvular heart disease (30%). Most respondents (76%) lack access to a dedicated cardio-obstetrics team, and only 29% of practicing cardiologists received cardio-obstetrics didactics during training. One third of fellows in training reported seeing pregnant women 0 to 1 time per year, and 12% of fellows in training report formal training in cardio-obstetrics. CONCLUSIONS: Formalized training in cardio-obstetrics is uncommon, and limited access to multidisciplinary cardio-obstetrics teams and large knowledge gaps exist among cardiovascular clinicians. Augmentation of cardio-obstetrics education across career stages is needed to reduce these deficits. These survey results are an initial step toward developing a standard expec-tation for clinicians’ training in cardio-obstetrics.