About this item:

55 Views | 37 Downloads

Author Notes:

Anaïs F. Stenson, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3901 Chrysler Service Drive, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Email: astenson@wayne.edu

This work was supported by funding from the NIH (MH100122; MH111682) and Brain and Behavior Research Foundation. Dr. Nugent’s effort is supported by R01MH108641 and R01105379. The authors thank Ye Ji Kim, L. Alexander Vance, and Aimee Clifford for their contributions to data collection and preparation.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: MH100122 and MH111682; Brain and Behavior Research Foundation; NIH Clinical Center, Grant/Award Number: R01MH108641 and R01105379

Keywords:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology, Developmental
  • Psychology, Experimental
  • Psychology
  • adolescence
  • anxiety
  • fear learning
  • puberty
  • violence exposure
  • ANXIETY DISORDERS
  • SEX-DIFFERENCES
  • EXTINCTION
  • CHILDREN
  • THREAT
  • BRAIN
  • MATURATION
  • REINSTATEMENT
  • ACQUISITION
  • PREVALENCE

Puberty drives fear learning during adolescence

Tools:

Journal Title:

DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE

Volume:

Volume 24, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages e13000-e13000

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Risk for adverse outcomes, including the onset of mental illness, increases during adolescence. This increase may be linked to both new exposures, such as violence at home or in the community, or to physiological changes driven by puberty. There are significant sex differences in adolescent risk, for instance, anxiety disorders are significantly more prevalent in girls than boys. Fear learning is linked to mental health and may develop during adolescence, but the role of puberty in adolescent-specific change has not yet been systematically evaluated. We conducted a longitudinal study of fear learning that tested fear-potentiated startle (FPS) in 78 children (40 girls) aged 8–16 years. Participants completed two to three visits that included a differential fear conditioning task and self-report of both pubertal status and violence exposure. We tested for effects of sex, pubertal status, and violence exposure on FPS over time with latent growth curve models. We also examined the association between FPS and later anxiety symptoms. We found significant changes in FPS to the threat cue, but not the safety cue, across visits. Higher pubertal status was significantly associated with increased FPS to threat cues at each visit, whereas sex and violence exposure were not. FPS to threat during the baseline visit also predicted later anxiety symptoms. These findings suggest that puberty drives increased fear response to threat cues similarly for girls and boys, and that this effect may not be significantly impacted by individual differences in violence exposure during early adolescence.
Export to EndNote