About this item:

48 Views | 26 Downloads

Author Notes:

Jacob J. Michaelson, jacob-michaelson@uiowa.edu

This version of this manuscript has been read and deemed acceptable by our stakeholder community advisory council, and we thank them for the time they invested in this process. We would like to thank those who gave feedback during development of the survey and manuscript, including Hana Zaydens, Katherine Imborek, Cassie Omlstead, and other contributors who wish to remain anonymous. We would also like to thank Lea Davis and Jess Ehrenfeld for assistance with recruitment. We also wish to thank the survey participants for making this research possible.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This work was funded by the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Iowa and in part by National Institutes of Health Predoctoral Training Grant T32GM008629 to TRT. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Keywords:

  • gender identity
  • sexual orientation
  • mental health

Community attitudes on genetic research of gender identity, sexual orientation, and mental health

Tools:

Journal Title:

PLoS One

Volume:

Volume 15, Number 7

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Sex is an important factor in mental health, and a non-binary view of how variation in sex and gender influence mental health represents a new research frontier that may yield new insights. The recent acceleration of research into sexual orientation, gender identity, and mental health has generally been conducted without sufficient understanding of the opinions of sexual and gender minorities (SGM) toward this research. We surveyed 768 individuals, with an enrichment of LGBTQ+ stakeholders, for their opinions regarding genetic research of SGM and mental health. We found that the key predictors of attitudes toward genetic research specifically on SGM are 1) general attitudes toward genetic and mental health research 2) tolerance of SGM and associated behaviors and 3) age of the participant. Non-heterosexual stakeholder status was significantly associated with increased willingness to participate in genetic research if a biological basis for gender identity were discovered. We also found that heterosexual, cisgender participants with a low tolerance for SGM indicated their SGM views would be positively updated if science showed a biological basis for their behaviors and identities. These findings represent an important first step in understanding and engaging the LGBTQ+ stakeholder community in the context of genetic research.

Copyright information:

© 2020 Thomas et al

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote