About this item:

65 Views | 51 Downloads

Author Notes:

Erin K. Box, University of Georgia, 589 D. W. Brooks Drive, Athens, 30602, GA, USA. Email: erin.box25@uga.edu

We thank Bob Ratajczak and Robert Bringolf for laboratory space and tilapia, as well as Abby Farrow and Gabriel Langford for Cuban treefrog tadpoles. We also thank Alex Lee for laboratory assistance.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by The Carter Center; a full listing of Carter Center supporters is available at http://www.cartercenter.org/donate/corporate-government-foundation-partners/index.html.

Additional support was provided by the wildlife management agencies of the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study member states through the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Act (50 Stat. 917) and by a U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Agreement.

Keywords:

  • Dracunculus
  • Copepod
  • Fish
  • Amphibian
  • Paratenic host
  • Transport host

Copepod consumption by amphibians and fish with implications for transmission of Dracunculus species

Tools:

Journal Title:

International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife

Volume:

Volume 15

Publisher:

, Pages 231-237

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Parasitic nematodes in the genus Dracunculus have a complex life cycle that requires more than one host species in both aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The most well-studied species, Dracunculus medinensis, is the causative agent of human Guinea worm disease (dracunculiasis). There are several other Dracunculus species that infect non-human animals, primarily wildlife (reptiles and mammals). The classic route of D. medinensis transmission to humans is through the ingestion of water containing the intermediate host, a cyclopoid copepod, infected with third-stage larvae (L3s). However, many animal hosts (e.g., terrestrial snakes, dogs) of other Dracunculus sp. appear unlikely to ingest a large number of copepods while drinking. Therefore, alternative routes of infection (e.g., paratenic or transport hosts) may facilitate Dracunculus transmission to these species. To better understand the role of paratenic and transport hosts in Dracunculus transmission to animal definitive hosts, we compared copepod ingestion rates for aquatic species (fish, frogs [tadpoles and adults], and newts) which may serve as paratenic or transport hosts. We hypothesized that fish would consume more copepods than amphibians. Our findings confirm that African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) and fish consume copepods, but that fish ingest, on average, significantly higher numbers (68% [34/50]) than adult African clawed frogs (36% [18/50]) during a 24-h time period. Our results suggest that amphibians and fish may play a role in the transmission of Dracunculus to definitive hosts. Still, additional research is required to determine whether, in the wild, fish or frogs are serving as paratenic or transport hosts. If so, they may facilitate Dracunculus transmission. However, if these animals simply act as dead-end hosts or as means of copepod population control, they may decrease Dracunculus transmission.

Copyright information:

© 2021 The Authors

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote