About this item:

69 Views | 31 Downloads

Author Notes:

Ryan P. Merkow, MD, MS, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair Street, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, ryan.merkow@northwestern.edu

Disclosures: None

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Drs. Q.L. Hu and J.Y. Liu receives salary support through a contract with Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (HHSP233201500020I). Dr. R.J. Ellis is supported by a postdoctoral research fellowship (AHRQ 5T32HS000078). Dr. R.P. Merkow is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS023011) and an Institutional Research Grant from the American Cancer Society (IRG-18–163-24).

Keywords:

  • Aged
  • Biliary Tract Neoplasms
  • Cholestasis
  • Databases, Factual
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Drainage
  • Endoscopy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Propensity Score
  • Quality Improvement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stents
  • Survival Rate

Association of preoperative biliary drainage technique with postoperative outcomes among patients with resectable hepatobiliary malignancy

Tools:

Journal Title:

HPB

Volume:

Volume 22, Number 2

Publisher:

, Pages 249-257

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background: Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are two techniques used for preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection. The objectives of this study were to determine predictors of the drainage technique selection and to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. Methods: Using ACS NSQIP data (2014–2017), patients who underwent preoperative biliary drainage prior to hepatobiliary resection for malignancy were identified. Separate multivariable-adjusted, propensity score (PS) adjusted, and PS matched logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between drainage technique and postoperative outcomes. Results: Of 527 patients identified, 431 (81.8%) received EBS and 96 (18.2%) received PTBD. Patients who underwent PTBD had more preoperative co-morbidities, including higher ASA class, recent weight loss, and hypoalbuminemia (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, PTBD was significantly associated with 30-day DSM (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.24–2.97, p = 0.004), overall SSI (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10–2.76, p = 0.019), and superficial SSI (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.20–3.60, p = 0.010). These findings remained significant for both PS-adjusted and PS-matched models. Conclusion: Patients undergoing hepatobiliary resection selected for PTBD had significantly more preoperative co-morbidities and nutritional deficits. Compared to EBS, PTBD was associated with significantly higher odds of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Copyright information:

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote