About this item:

83 Views | 39 Downloads

Author Notes:

Email: adaruich.matet@gmail.com; Tel.: +33-1-44-38-19-69

Conceptualization F.B.-C. and J.H.B.; data curation, A.D.; formal analysis, A.D. and E.P.; funding acquisition, A.D., F.B.-C. and J.H.B.; investigation, A.D. and E.P.; methodology, A.D., E.P., J.G., T.J., L.P., K.D., M.-C.N. and M.B.; supervision, E.P. and F.B.-C.; writing—original draft, A.D.; writing—review and editing, E.P., J.G., J.H.B. and F.B.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Subject:

Research Funding:

Abraham J. and Phyllis Katz Foundation, USA; Fondation de l’Avenir, France; Association Française des Amblyopes Unilatéraux, France; Prix Retina 2017, Swiss VitreoRetinal Group and Novartis, Switzerland; NIH R01EY028859, R01EY028450, P30EY06360, and VA I01RX002806 and I21RX001924, VARR&D C9246C USA. The sponsors did not have any role in the study.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Chemistry, Medicinal
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy
  • UDCA
  • TUDCA
  • retina
  • retinal detachment
  • retinal degeneration
  • neuroprotection
  • PROTECTS
  • ACTIVATION
  • APOPTOSIS
  • SURVIVAL
  • RECEPTOR
  • TAURINE
  • MOUSE
  • CELLS

Comparative Analysis of Urso- and Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Neuroprotective Effects on Retinal Degeneration Models

Tools:

Journal Title:

PHARMACEUTICALS

Volume:

Volume 15, Number 3

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background: Ursodeoxycholic (UDCA) and tauroursodeoxycholic (TUDCA) acids have shown neuroprotective properties in neurodegenerative diseases, but differential effects of the two bile acids have been poorly explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the neuroprotective effects of UDCA versus TUDCA in a neuroretinal degeneration model and to compare transcriptionally regulated pathways. Methods: The WERI-Rb-1 human cone-like cell line and retinal explants were exposed to albumin and TUDCA or UDCA. Viability, cell death, and microglial activation were quantified. Transcriptionally regulated pathways were analyzed after RNA sequencing using the edgeR bioconductor package. Results: Pre-treatment of cone-like cells with UDCA or TUDCA significantly protected cells from albumin toxicity. On retinal explants, either bile acid reduced apoptosis, necroptosis, and microglia activation at 6 h. TUDCA induced the regulation of 463 genes, whilst 31 genes were regulated by UDCA. Only nineteen common genes were regulated by both bile acids, mainly involved in iron control, cell death, oxidative stress, and cell metabolism. As compared to UDCA, TUDCA up-regulated genes involved in endoplasmic reticulum stress pathways and down-regulated genes involved in axonal and neuronal development. Conclusions: Either bile acid protected against albumin-induced cell loss. However, TUDCA regulated substantially more neuroprotective genes than UDCA.

Copyright information:

© 2022 by the authors.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote