About this item:

97 Views | 44 Downloads

Author Notes:

Larelle H. Bookhart, Doctoral Program in Nutrition and Health Sciences, Laney Graduate School, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Email: lhigh2@emory.edu

LHB, EHA, MRK, CGP, HR‐R, UR and MFY conceptualised the research question, study design and analytical approach. EHA and CGP contributed to data acquisition. LHB conducted data analysis. LHB, EHA, MRK, CGP, HR‐R, UR and MFY contributed to data interpretation. LHB wrote the first and subsequent drafts of the article. LHB, EHA, MRK, CGP, HR‐R, UR and MFY contributed to critically revising the article and gave approval of the version to be published.

We thank Deja Edwards who assisted with qualitative data analysis.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This document was financially supported by the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) to support the Reducing Disparities in Breastfeeding through Continuity of Care Project through funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), award number 18NU38OTOOO306.

This document was also financially supported by the Emory Maternal and Child Health Center of Excellence, with support from Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Bureau under award T76MC28446.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Nutrition & Dietetics
  • Pediatrics
  • breast milk substitutes
  • breastfeeding
  • breastfeeding initiation
  • developed countries
  • infant formula
  • qualitative methods
  • MILK
  • MOTHERS
  • PERCEPTIONS
  • MANAGEMENT
  • LACTATION
  • BARRIERS
  • NEWBORNS

A nation-wide study on the common reasons for infant formula supplementation among healthy, term, breastfed infants in US hospitals

Tools:

Journal Title:

MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION

Volume:

Volume 18, Number 2

Publisher:

, Pages e13294-e13294

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

In-hospital infant formula supplementation of breastfed infants reduces breastfeeding duration, yet little is known about common reasons for infant formula supplementation. We examined the three most common reasons for in-hospital infant formula supplementation of healthy, term, breastfed infants in the US reported by hospital staff. Hospital data were obtained from the 2018 Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey (n = 2045), which is completed by hospital staff. An open-ended question on the top three reasons for in-hospital infant formula supplementation was analyzed using thematic qualitative analysis and the frequencies for each reason were reported. The top three most common reasons for in-hospital infant formula supplementation reported by hospital staff included medical indications (70.0%); maternal request/preference/feelings (55.9%); lactation management-related issues (51.3%); physical but non-medically indicated reasons (36.1%); social influences (18.8%); perceived cultural/societal/demographic factors (8.2%) and medical staff/institutional practices (4.7%). These findings suggest that a variety of factors should be considered to address unnecessary infant formula supplementation. Lactation management support delivered in a timely and culturally sensitive manner and targeted to mother-infant dyads with potential medical and physical indications may reduce unnecessary in-hospital infant formula supplementation.

Copyright information:

© 2021 The Authors. Maternal & Child Nutrition published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote