About this item:

56 Views | 32 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: E. S. Rosenberg, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY 12144, erosenberg2@albany.edu

Acknowledgements: We thank Dr John Brooks (Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]) and Dr Steven Goodreau (University of Washington) for their insights regarding sexual transmission.

Disclosures: All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This study was supported by the CDC.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Immunology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Zika virus
  • arbovirus
  • household transmission
  • sexual transmission
  • Male sexual transmission
  • Outbreak

Prevalence and Incidence of Zika Virus Infection Among Household Contacts of Patients With Zika Virus Disease, Puerto Rico, 2016-2017

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Infectious Diseases

Volume:

Volume 220, Number 6

Publisher:

, Pages 932-939

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Background. Little is known about the prevalence or incidence of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in settings affected by the 2015–2016 Zika pandemic and associated risk factors. We assessed these factors among household contacts of patients with ZIKV disease enrolled in a cohort study in Puerto Rico during 2016–2017. Methods. Household contacts of index case patients completed a questionnaire and gave specimens for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing to detect ZIKV infection. We measured the prevalence of ZIKV infection among contacts and associated individual and household factors, examined sexual transmission using a sexual-networks approach, and assessed incident infection among initially uninfected household contacts 2–4 months later. Results. Of 366 contacts, 34.4% had evidence of ZIKV infection at enrollment, including 11.2% by RT-PCR. Having open doors and windows that were either screened (prevalence ratio [PR], 2.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.2–3.6]) or unscreened (PR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.5–4.1]) was associated with increased prevalence. Sexual partners were more likely to both be RT-PCR positive relative to other relationships (odds ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1–4.5]). At follow-up, 6.1% of contacts had evidence of incident infection. Conclusions. This study identified sexual contact as a risk factor for ZIKV infection. Persons living with ZIKV-infected individuals should be a focus of public health efforts.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.

Export to EndNote