About this item:

92 Views | 75 Downloads

Author Notes:

Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Email: ycommod1@jhu.edu

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the National Institutes of Health, or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Subjects:

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
  • blood pressure
  • cardiovascular disease
  • hypertension
  • prevention
  • screening
  • TEAM-BASED CARE
  • AGED 60 YEARS
  • PRESSURE CONTROL
  • CLINICAL-PRACTICE
  • AMERICAN-COLLEGE
  • HEALTH-CARE
  • MANAGEMENT
  • ADULTS
  • IMPACT
  • DISPARITIES

Proceedings From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Workshop to Control Hypertension

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION

Volume:

Volume 35, Number 3

Publisher:

, Pages 232-243

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Hypertension treatment and control prevent more cardiovascular events than management of other modifiable risk factors. Although the age-adjusted proportion of US adults with controlled blood pressure (BP) defined as <140/90 mm Hg, improved from 31.8% in 1999-2000 to 48.5% in 2007-2008, it remained stable through 2013-2014 and declined to 43.7% in 2017-2018. To address the rapid decline in hypertension control, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention convened a virtual workshop with multidisciplinary national experts. Also, the group sought to identify opportunities to reverse the adverse trend and further improve hypertension control. The workshop immediately preceded the Surgeon General's Call to Action to Control Hypertension, which recognized a stagnation in progress with hypertension control. The presentations and discussions included potential reasons for the decline and challenges in hypertension control, possible "big ideas,"and multisector approaches that could reverse the current trend while addressing knowledge gaps and research priorities. The broad set of "big ideas"was comprised of various activities that may improve hypertension control, including: interventions to engage patients, promotion of self-measured BP monitoring with clinical support, supporting team-based care, implementing telehealth, enhancing community-clinical linkages, advancing precision population health, developing tailored public health messaging, simplifying hypertension treatment, using process and outcomes quality metrics to foster accountability and efficiency, improving access to high-quality health care, addressing social determinants of health, supporting cardiovascular public health and research, and lowering financial barriers to hypertension control.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/rdf).
Export to EndNote