A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone‐beam CT on three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early‐stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position

• Authors: Annie Xiao, The University of Chicago; Jessica Jutzy, The University of Chicago; Greg Hubert, The University of Minnesota; Meghan Edens, The University of Chicago; Maxine Washington, Emory University; Yasmin Hasan, The University of Chicago; Steven J. Chmura, The University of Chicago; Hania A. Al-Hallaq, The University of Chicago
• Journal Title: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
• Volume: Volume 21, Number 12
• Publisher: The American College of Medical Physics and American Institute of Physics | 2020-12-01, Pages 146-154
• Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF
• Publisher DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13080
• Subjects: Health Sciences, Medicine and Surgery; Health Sciences, Radiology; Health Sciences, Oncology
• Keywords: breast cancer; cone‐beam CT; prone positioning; setup margins; whole‐breast radiotherapy

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the dosimetric impact of daily positioning variations measured with cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) on whole‐breast radiotherapy patients treated in the prone position. Methods Daily CBCT was prospectively acquired for 30 consecutive patients positioned prone. Treatment for early‐stage (≤II) breast cancer was prescribed with standard dose (50 Gy/25 fractions) or hypofractionation (42.56 Gy/16 fractions) for 13 and 17 patients, respectively. Systematic and random errors were calculated from the translational CBCT shifts and used to determine population‐based setup margins. Mean translations (±one standard deviation) for each patient were used to simulate the dosimetric impact on targets (PTV_eval and lumpectomy cavity), heart, and lung. Paired Student’s t tests at α = 0.01 were used to compare dose metrics after correction for multiple testing (P < 0.002). Significant correlation coefficients were used to identify associations (P < 0.01). Results Of 597 total fractions, 20 ± 13% required patient rotation. Mean translations were 0.29 ± 0.27 cm, 0.41 ± 0.34 cm, and 0.48 ± 0.33 cm in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior, and lateral directions leading to calculated setup margins of 0.63, 0.88, and 1.10 cm, respectively. Average three‐dimensional (3D) shifts correlated with the maximum distance of breast tissue from the sternum (r = 0.62) but not with body‐mass index. Simulated shifts showed significant, but minor, changes in dose metrics for PTV_eval, lung, and heart. For left‐sided treatments (n = 18), mean heart dose increased from 109 ± 75 cGy to 148 ± 115 cGy. Shifts from the original plan caused PTV_eval hotspots (V105%) to increase by 5.2% ± 3.8%, which correlated with the total MU of wedged fields (r = 0.59). No significant change in V95% to the cavity was found. Conclusions Large translational variations that occur when positioning prone breast patients had small but significant dosimetric effects on 3DCRT plans. Daily CBCT may still be necessary to correct for rotational variations that occur in 20% of treatments. To maintain planned dose metrics, unintended beam shifts toward the heart and the contribution of wedged fields should be minimized.