About this item:

65 Views | 39 Downloads

Author Notes:

Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula, MD, MSc, Section of Interventional Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta 30322, GA. Email: svalla4@emory.edu

SV, SHP, WC did study design, literature review, statistical analysis. SV, SHP, WC did data management, data analysis, drafting manuscript. SV, SHP, WC, DRH, BJG: Access to data. DRH, BJG: Manuscript revision, intellectual revisions, mentorship. SV, SHP, WC, DRH, BJG. Final approval.

All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Dr. Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula is supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents

Keywords:

  • acute myocardial infarction
  • healthcare disparities
  • outcomes research
  • season
  • winter

Influence of seasons on the management and outcomes acute myocardial infarction: An 18‐year US study

Tools:

Journal Title:

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY

Volume:

Volume 43, Number 10

Publisher:

, Pages 1175-1185

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Background There are limited data on the seasonal variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the contemporary literature. Hypothesis There would be decrease in the seasonal variation in the management and outcomes of AMI. Methods Adult (>18 years) AMI admissions were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000‐2017). Seasons were classified as spring, summer, fall, and winter. Outcomes of interest included prevalence, in‐hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subgroup analyses for type of AMI and patient characteristics were performed. Results Of the 10 880 856 AMI admissions, 24.3%, 22.9%, 22.2%, and 24.2% were admitted in spring, summer, fall, and winter, respectively. The four cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, and comorbidities distribution. Rates of coronary angiography and PCI were slightly but significantly lower in winter (62.6% and 40.7%) in comparison to the other seasons (64‐65% and 42‐43%, respectively) (P < .001). Compared to spring, winter admissions had higher in‐hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06‐1.08), whereas summer (aOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96‐0.98) and fall (aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97‐0.99) had slightly lower in‐hospital mortality (P < .001). ST‐segment elevation (10.0% vs 9.1%; aOR 1.07; 95% CI 1.06‐1.08) and non‐ST‐segment elevation (4.7% vs 4.2%; aOR 1.07; 95% CI 1.06‐1.09) AMI admissions in winter had higher in‐hospital mortality compared to spring (P < .001). The primary results were consistent when stratified by age, sex, race, geographic region, and admission year. Conclusions Compared to other seasons, winter admission was associated with higher in‐hospital mortality in AMI in the United States.

Copyright information:

© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote