About this item:

111 Views | 41 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Mark A. Lyle, Division of Physical Therapy, Department or Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30332, Ph: (404) 712-2087, mark.lyle@emory.edu

Author contributions: The experiments were completed in the Neurophysiology lab at Georgia Institute of Technology. All authors contributed to conception, acquisition, analysis and interpretation, writing and approval of the final version of the manuscript. ML was responsible for making figures. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the work, as well as the drafting and final approval of the manuscript. Data collection was completed in the Neurophysiology Lab at Georgia Institute of Technology.

Disclosures: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

The study was supported by a NRSA Postdoctoral Fellowship (F32NS080393) to M. Lyle and HD32571 to TR Nichols.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Neurosciences
  • Physiology
  • Neurosciences & Neurology
  • Golgi tendon organ
  • force feedback
  • spinal reflex
  • muscle spindle
  • stretch reflex
  • Triceps surea muscles
  • Group I afferents
  • Heterogenic reflexes
  • Hindlimb extensors
  • Mechanical actions
  • Force feedback
  • Soleus muscle
  • Inhibition
  • Pathways
  • Ankle

Evaluating intermuscular Golgi tendon organ feedback with twitch contractions

Tools:

Journal Title:

Journal of Physiology London

Volume:

Volume 597, Number 17

Publisher:

, Pages 4627-4642

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Force feedback from Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) has widespread intermuscular projections mediated by interneurons that share inputs from muscle spindles, among others. Because current methods to study GTO circuitry (nerve stimulation or muscle stretch) also activate muscle spindle afferents, the selective role of GTOs remains uncertain. Here, we tested the hypothesis that intramuscular stimulation evoked twitch contractions could be used to naturally bias activation of GTOs and thus evaluate their intermuscular effects in decerebrate cats. This was achieved by comparing the effects of twitch contractions and stretches as donor inputs onto the motor output of recipient muscles. Donor–recipient pairs evaluated included those already known in the cat to receive donor excitatory muscle spindle feedback only, inhibitory GTO feedback only, and both excitatory spindle and inhibitory GTO effects. Muscle stretch, but not twitch contractions, evoked excitation onto recipient muscles with muscle spindle afferent inputs only. Both donor muscle stretch and twitch contractions inhibited a recipient muscle with GTO projections only. In a recipient muscle that receives both muscle spindle and GTO projections, donor muscle stretch evoked both excitatory and inhibitory effects, whereas twitch contractions evoked inhibitory effects only. These data support the hypothesis that muscle stimulation evoked contractions can induce intermuscular effects most consistent with mechanical GTO receptor activation and not direct activation of sensory axons. We propose this approach can be used to evaluate GTO circuitry more selectively than muscle stretch or nerve stimulation and can be adapted to study GTO feedback non-invasively in freely moving cats and humans.

Copyright information:

© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2019 The Physiological Society.

Export to EndNote