About this item:

102 Views | 47 Downloads

Author Notes:

Corresponding author; email: tfriedri@wisc.edu

DO and TF: These authors contributed equally

GM, KB, and KR: These authors contributed equally

We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Trevor Bedford and the entire Nextstrain team for making Nextstrain phylogenetic tools publicly available and for their commitment to tracking the global spread of SARS-CoV-2.

We also acknowledge the GISAID team for maintaining the largest public repository of SARS-CoV-2 sequence- and metadata.

Lastly, we thank Dr. Louise Moncla for her careful reading of and insightful comments on this manuscript.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This project was funded in part through a COVID-19 Response grant from the Wisconsin Partnership Program at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health.

KMB is supported by F30 AI145182-01A1 from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

GKM is supported by an NLM training grant to the Computation and Informatics in Biology and Medicine Training Program (NLM 5T15LM007359).

Keywords:

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 infection
  • viral suppression
  • genomics

Distinct patterns of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in two nearby communities in Wisconsin, USA

Show all authors Show less authors

Tools:

Journal Title:

medRxiv

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Evidence-based public health approaches that minimize the introduction and spread of new SARS-CoV-2 transmission clusters are urgently needed in the United States and other countries struggling with expanding epidemics. Here we analyze 247 full-genome SARS-CoV-2 sequences from two nearby communities in Wisconsin, USA, and find surprisingly distinct patterns of viral spread. Dane County had the 12th known introduction of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States, but this did not lead to descendant community spread. Instead, the Dane County outbreak was seeded by multiple later introductions, followed by limited community spread. In contrast, relatively few introductions in Milwaukee County led to extensive community spread. We present evidence for reduced viral spread in both counties, and limited viral transmission between counties, following the statewide Safer-at-Home public health order, which went into effect 25 March 2020. Our results suggest that early containment efforts suppressed the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within Wisconsin.

Copyright information:

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote