About this item:

244 Views | 134 Downloads

Author Notes:

dwstout@emory.edu; a.faisal@imperial.ac.uk

D.S. conceived the study and conducted the replication experiments.

T.C. analyzed brain imaging data.

A.A.F. developed the action grammars and behaviour analytics methods.

AAF and AS analysed the data.

JA contributed to ethogram development and coded videos.

DS, AAF, and TC wrote the paper.

We thank Andreas Thomik for his work developing and applying pattern recognition methods, Francois Belletti for software development support, and James Steele and Daniel Wolpert for support and encouragement that made this project possible at the start.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subject:

Research Funding:

This work was supported by the Commission of the European Communities Research Directorate-General Specific Targeted Project Number 029065, “Hand to Mouth: A framework for understanding the archaeological and fossil records of human cognitive evolution” and National Science Foundation (USA) Grant SMA-1328567 and a UKRI Turing AI Fellowship Grant EP/V025449/1 (AAF).

Keywords:

  • human behavior
  • toolmaking
  • language
  • evolution
  • hierarchical action sequencing
  • replication

The measurement, evolution, and neural representation of action grammars of human behavior

Tools:

Journal Title:

Scientific Reports

Volume:

Volume 11

Publisher:

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Human behaviors from toolmaking to language are thought to rely on a uniquely evolved capacity for hierarchical action sequencing. Testing this idea will require objective, generalizable methods for measuring the structural complexity of real-world behavior. Here we present a data-driven approach for extracting action grammars from basic ethograms, exemplified with respect to the evolutionarily relevant behavior of stone toolmaking. We analyzed sequences from the experimental replication of ~ 2.5 Mya Oldowan vs. ~ 0.5 Mya Acheulean tools, finding that, while using the same “alphabet” of elementary actions, Acheulean sequences are quantifiably more complex and Oldowan grammars are a subset of Acheulean grammars. We illustrate the utility of our complexity measures by re-analyzing data from an fMRI study of stone toolmaking to identify brain responses to structural complexity. Beyond specific implications regarding the co-evolution of language and technology, this exercise illustrates the general applicability of our method to investigate naturalistic human behavior and cognition.

Copyright information:

© The Author(s) 2021

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote