About this item:

187 Views | 285 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: matthew.a.reyna@emory.edu

Disclosures: The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

Supported, in part, by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.

This work was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number UL1TR002378 and the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals (www.physionet.org) (R01GM104987).

Drs. Reyna, Jeter, Nemati, and Clifford are partially funded by the National Science Foundation under award number 1822378 (Leveraging Heterogeneous Data Across International Borders in a Privacy Preserving Manner for Clinical Deep Learning).

Mr. Shashikumar and Dr. Nemati are also funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) award number K01ES025445.

Drs. Reyna, Josef, Jeter, Westover, Clifford, and Sharma received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Josef’s institution received funding from NIH (T-32 Grant Trainee: T32GM095442-09) and Henry M. Jackson Foundation for role as a post-doctoral researcher for the Surgical Critical Care Institute, www.sc2i.org, funded through the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Program—Joint Program Committee 6/Combat Casualty Care (Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences HT9404-13-1-0032 and HU0001-15-2-0001) and was supported by a grant from the NIH, United States (NIH grant: 5T32GM095442-09).

Dr. Clifford’s institution received funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and NIH and he received cloud credits from Google Cloud.

Dr. Sharma’s institution received funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and he received funding from Google (travel reimbursement for a talk at a seminar).

Dr. Sharma and the development of the cloud-based scoring system were partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (U24CA215109).

Keywords:

  • Algorithms
  • Early Diagnosis
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Sepsis
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • United States

Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019.

Journal Title:

Critical Care Medicine

Volume:

Volume 48, Number 2

Publisher:

, Pages 210-217

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a major public health concern with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses. Early detection and antibiotic treatment of sepsis improve outcomes. However, although professional critical care societies have proposed new clinical criteria that aid sepsis recognition, the fundamental need for early detection and treatment remains unmet. In response, researchers have proposed algorithms for early sepsis detection, but directly comparing such methods has not been possible because of different patient cohorts, clinical variables and sepsis criteria, prediction tasks, evaluation metrics, and other differences. To address these issues, the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2019 facilitated the development of automated, open-source algorithms for the early detection of sepsis from clinical data. DESIGN: Participants submitted containerized algorithms to a cloud-based testing environment, where we graded entries for their binary classification performance using a novel clinical utility-based evaluation metric. We designed this scoring function specifically for the Challenge to reward algorithms for early predictions and penalize them for late or missed predictions and for false alarms. SETTING: ICUs in three separate hospital systems. We shared data from two systems publicly and sequestered data from all three systems for scoring. PATIENTS: We sourced over 60,000 ICU patients with up to 40 clinical variables for each hour of a patient's ICU stay. We applied Sepsis-3 clinical criteria for sepsis onset. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 104 groups from academia and industry participated, contributing 853 submissions. Furthermore, 90 abstracts based on Challenge entries were accepted for presentation at Computing in Cardiology. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse computational approaches predict the onset of sepsis several hours before clinical recognition, but generalizability to different hospital systems remains a challenge.

Copyright information:

© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote