About this item:

117 Views | 83 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence: Yong-Kyu Kim, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Farm Research Campus, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn, VA 20147. Tel: (571) 209-4180; Fax: (571) 209-4941; E-mail: kimy11@janelia.hhmi.org

We are grateful to Wyatt Anderson, Lee Ehrman, Jean-Francois Ferveur, John Ringo, Daisuke Yamamoto, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and discussions on the early versions of this manuscript; to Jonathan Arnold for his statistical advice; and to Linbin Zhang for technical support.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health R01 HD060679 to Y. T.

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Environmental Sciences & Ecology
  • Courtship
  • cuticular hydrocarbons
  • D. albomicans
  • D. nasuta
  • mating behavior
  • speciation
  • Incipient reproductive isolation
  • Subsequent adult behavior
  • Cuticular hydrocarbons
  • Developmental isolation
  • Premating isolation
  • Mating preference
  • Mate recognition
  • Melanogaster
  • Speciation
  • Chromosome

Evidence for no sexual isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta

Tools:

Journal Title:

Ecology and Evolution

Volume:

Volume 3, Number 7

Publisher:

, Pages 2061-2074

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

Sexual isolation, the reduced tendency to mate, is one of the reproductive barriers that prevent gene flow between different species. Various species-specific signals during courtship contribute to sexual isolation between species. Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta are closely related species of the nasuta subgroup within the Drosophila immigrans group and are distributed in allopatry. We analyzed mating behavior and courtship as well as cuticular hydrocarbon profiles within and between species. Here, we report that these two species randomly mated with each other. We did not observe any sexual isolation between species or between strains within species by multiple-choice tests. Significant difference in the courtship index was detected between these two species, but males and females of both species showed no discrimination against heterospecific partners. Significant quantitative variations in cuticular hydrocarbons between these two species were also found, but the cuticular hydrocarbons appear to play a negligible role in both courtship and sexual isolation between these two species. In contrast to the evident postzygotic isolation, the lack of sexual isolation between these two species suggests that the evolution of premating isolation may lag behind that of the intergenomic incompatibility, which might be driven by intragenomic conflicts. © 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution.

Copyright information:

© 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/).
Export to EndNote