About this item:

121 Views | 111 Downloads

Author Notes:

Gwendolynne Reid, Oxford College of Emory University, 801 Emory St., Oxford, GA 30054, USA. Email: gwendolynne.reid@emory.edu

I would like to thank Clay, Soren, and the other members of the Heartbeats Project team for their generosity in providing me with an inside look at their writing.

I am also indebted to Carolyn Miller and Chris Anson for their comments on earlier versions of this analysis.

Finally, I am grateful for Written Communication editor Chad Wickman’s incisive critiques and suggestions, as well as for the two anonymous reviewers who pushed my thinking.

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Keywords:

  • scientific writing
  • multimodal semiotics
  • digital writing
  • citizen science
  • writing in the disciplines

Compressing, Expanding, and Attending to Scientific Meaning: Writing the Semiotic Hybrid of Science for Professional and Citizen Scientists

Tools:

Journal Title:

WRITTEN COMMUNICATION

Volume:

Volume 36, Number 1

Publisher:

, Pages 68-98

Type of Work:

Article | Post-print: After Peer Review

Abstract:

Drawing on a text-based ethnography of digital writing in a biology laboratory, this article examines the text trajectory of a scientific manuscript and a scientific team’s related writing for public audiences, including for citizen scientists. Using data drawn from texts, observations, interviews, and related artifacts, the author examines how scientists conceptualize and adapt their multimodal writing for specialized scientific audiences as well as lay audiences interested in the work of scientific inquiry. Three concepts—meaning compression, meaning expansion, and meaning attention—were used to analyze the multimodal strategies that scientists employ when composing for different audiences. Findings suggest that while scientists often restrict their writing practices to meaning compression to maintain the values and conventions of scientific genres, they also sometimes deploy a wider range of multimodal strategies when writing for nonspecialist audiences. These findings underscore the complex rhetorical environments scientists navigate and the need to support emerging scientific writers’ development as versatile writers able to adapt varied multimodal strategies to diverse rhetorical and epistemic goals.

Copyright information:

© 2018 SAGE Publications

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Export to EndNote