About this item:

140 Views | 125 Downloads

Author Notes:

Correspondence to C. Ross Ethier, ross.ethier@bme.gatech.edu

JMS, EMB, AJF, CRE, and DRO contributed to conception and design of the study.

EMB carried out ex vivo experiments.

JMS carried out in vitro experiments, developed the ocular compliance measurement and processing methodology, and performed the statistical analysis.

JMS, DRO, CRE, and KP carried out the mathematical formulation.

JMS and EMB wrote the first draft of the manuscript.

CRE and DRO wrote sections of the manuscript.

All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.

JMS receives consultancy income for building and providing iPerfusion systems. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Subjects:

Research Funding:

National Institutes of Health - R21EY026685

National Institutes of Health - EY022359

Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellowship, UK

RR&D Service Career Development Award - RX002342

Bright Focus Foundation - G2015145

National Institutes of Health - EY019696

Keywords:

  • Science & Technology
  • Life Sciences & Biomedicine
  • Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology
  • Multidisciplinary Sciences
  • Science & Technology - Other Topics
  • sclera
  • cornea
  • ocular rigidity
  • ocular compliance
  • glaucoma
  • OUTFLOW FACILITY
  • BIOMECHANICS
  • ELASTICITY
  • VEGF

Measurement of Ocular Compliance Using iPerfusion

Tools:

Journal Title:

Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Volume:

Volume 7, Number OCT

Publisher:

, Pages 276-276

Type of Work:

Article | Final Publisher PDF

Abstract:

The pressure-volume relationship of the eye is determined by the biomechanical properties of the corneoscleral shell and is classically characterised by Friedenwald’s coefficient of ocular rigidity or, alternatively, by the ocular compliance (OC), defined as dV/dP. OC is important in any situation where the volume (V) or pressure (P) of the eye is perturbed, as occurs during several physiological and pathological processes. However, accurately measuring OC is challenging, particularly in rodents. We measured OC in 24 untreated enucleated eyes from 12 C57BL/6 mice using the iPerfusion system to apply controlled pressure steps, whilst measuring the time-varying flow rate into the eye. Pressure and flow data were analysed by a “Discrete Volume” (integrating the flow trace) and “Step Response” method (fitting an analytical solution to the pressure trace). OC evaluated at 13 mmHg was similar between the two methods (Step Response, 41 [37, 46] vs. Discrete Volume, 42 [37, 48] nl/mmHg; mean [95% CI]), although the Step Response Method yielded tighter confidence bounds on individual eyes. OC was tightly correlated between contralateral eyes (R2 = 0.75, p = 0.0003). Following treatment with the cross-linking agent genipin, OC decreased by 40 [33, 47]% (p = 0.0001; N = 6, Step Response Method). Measuring OC provides a powerful tool to assess corneoscleral biomechanics in mice and other species.

Copyright information:

© 2019 Sherwood, Boazak, Feola, Parker, Ethier and Overby.

This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Export to EndNote